Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1644929 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-18 23:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-18 23:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC 04/11] ima: add support to namespace securityfs file Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> - 2017-05-18 23:40 +0200
| From | Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-18 23:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 04/11] ima: add support to namespace securityfs file |
| Message-ID | <tIBjj-Bq-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Guilherme,
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:59:56AM -0300, Guilherme Magalhaes wrote:
> +static int ima_open_namespaces(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + if (!(filp->f_flags & O_WRONLY))
> + return -EACCES;
> +
> + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return -EPERM;
> +
> + if (test_and_set_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags))
> + return -EBUSY;
It probably makes sense to do something like:
if (!(ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_NAMESPACE))
return -EINVAL;
here.
I'll keep playing around with this patchset and see if I have any
other feedback.
Cheers,
Tycho
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web