Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1642975 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-17 06:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-23 03:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 3/4] PM / OPP: opp-microvolt is not optional if regulators are set Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-05-17 06:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/4] PM / OPP: opp-microvolt is not optional if regulators are set Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-05-23 03:30 +0200
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-17 06:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 3/4] PM / OPP: opp-microvolt is not optional if regulators are set |
| Message-ID | <tHZ4m-6Ti-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
If dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() is called for a device and its regulators
are set in the OPP core, the OPP nodes for the device must contain the
"opp-microvolt" property, otherwise there is something wrong and we
better error out.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/base/power/opp/of.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
index 779428676f63..c6fc8cbad10d 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
@@ -131,8 +131,15 @@ static int opp_parse_supplies(struct dev_pm_opp *opp, struct device *dev,
prop = of_find_property(opp->np, name, NULL);
/* Missing property isn't a problem, but an invalid entry is */
- if (!prop)
- return 0;
+ if (!prop) {
+ /* The regulator-count must be zero here */
+ if (!opp_table->regulator_count)
+ return 0;
+
+ dev_err(dev, "%s: opp-microvolt missing even if regulators are available\n",
+ __func__);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
vcount = of_property_count_u32_elems(opp->np, name);
--
2.13.0.303.g4ebf3021692d
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-23 03:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/4] PM / OPP: opp-microvolt is not optional if regulators are set |
| Message-ID | <tK6O6-4Nz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1642975 |
On 05/17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> If dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() is called for a device and its regulators
> are set in the OPP core, the OPP nodes for the device must contain the
> "opp-microvolt" property, otherwise there is something wrong and we
> better error out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
> index 779428676f63..c6fc8cbad10d 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
> @@ -131,8 +131,15 @@ static int opp_parse_supplies(struct dev_pm_opp *opp, struct device *dev,
> prop = of_find_property(opp->np, name, NULL);
>
> /* Missing property isn't a problem, but an invalid entry is */
> - if (!prop)
> - return 0;
> + if (!prop) {
> + /* The regulator-count must be zero here */
Comment is restating code with no insight into what's so special,
how about:
/*
* But it better not be missing if we're
* expecting OPP core to manage regulators
*/
Although I suppose the dev_err message is pretty good.
> + if (!opp_table->regulator_count)
> + return 0;
> +
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: opp-microvolt missing even if regulators are available\n",
"missing although OPP managing regulators"?
> + __func__);
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web