Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1642069 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-15 23:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-16 16:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH V16 10/11] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-05-15 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V16 10/11] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-05-16 16:50 +0200
| From | Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-15 23:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH V16 10/11] trace, ras: add ARM processor error trace event |
| Message-ID | <tHvJ1-4Yr-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Currently there are trace events for the various RAS
errors with the exception of ARM processor type errors.
Add a new trace event for such errors so that the user
will know when they occur. These trace events are
consistent with the ARM processor error section type
defined in UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 6 +++++-
drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 1 +
drivers/ras/ras.c | 6 ++++++
include/linux/ras.h | 3 +++
include/ras/ras_event.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index 1106722..2dddb3b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -518,7 +518,11 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
}
#endif
- else {
+ else if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM)) {
+ struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
+
+ call_arm_trace_event(err);
+ } else {
void *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
call_non_standard_trace_event(&sec_type, fru_id,
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
index d5a5855..48a8f69 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <linux/bcd.h>
#include <acpi/ghes.h>
+#include <ras/ras_event.h>
#define INDENT_SP " "
diff --git a/drivers/ras/ras.c b/drivers/ras/ras.c
index 57363be..8655ef4 100644
--- a/drivers/ras/ras.c
+++ b/drivers/ras/ras.c
@@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ void call_non_standard_trace_event(const uuid_le *sec_type,
trace_non_standard_event(sec_type, fru_id, fru_text, sev, err, len);
}
+void call_arm_trace_event(struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err)
+{
+ trace_arm_event(err);
+}
+
static int __init ras_init(void)
{
int rc = 0;
@@ -36,3 +41,4 @@ static int __init ras_init(void)
#endif
EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(mc_event);
EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(non_standard_event);
+EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(arm_event);
diff --git a/include/linux/ras.h b/include/linux/ras.h
index 7d397a1..988e3ac 100644
--- a/include/linux/ras.h
+++ b/include/linux/ras.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#define __RAS_H__
#include <linux/uuid.h>
+#include <linux/cper.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
int ras_userspace_consumers(void);
@@ -17,10 +18,12 @@
void call_non_standard_trace_event(const uuid_le *sec_type,
const uuid_le *fru_id, const char *fru_text, const u8 sev,
const u8 *err, const u32 len);
+void call_arm_trace_event(struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err);
#else
static void call_non_standard_trace_event(const uuid_le *sec_type,
const uuid_le *fru_id, const char *fru_text, const u8 sev,
const u8 *err, const u32 len) { return; }
+static void call_arm_trace_event(struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err) { return; }
#endif
#endif
diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
index 4f79ba9..429f46f 100644
--- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
+++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
@@ -162,6 +162,51 @@
);
/*
+ * ARM Processor Events Report
+ *
+ * This event is generated when hardware detects an ARM processor error
+ * has occurred. UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
+ */
+TRACE_EVENT(arm_event,
+
+ TP_PROTO(const struct cper_sec_proc_arm *proc),
+
+ TP_ARGS(proc),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __field(u64, mpidr)
+ __field(u64, midr)
+ __field(u32, running_state)
+ __field(u32, psci_state)
+ __field(u8, affinity)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ if (proc->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_VALID_AFFINITY_LEVEL)
+ __entry->affinity = proc->affinity_level;
+ else
+ __entry->affinity = ~0;
+ if (proc->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_VALID_MPIDR)
+ __entry->mpidr = proc->mpidr;
+ else
+ __entry->mpidr = 0ULL;
+ __entry->midr = proc->midr;
+ if (proc->validation_bits & CPER_ARM_VALID_RUNNING_STATE) {
+ __entry->running_state = proc->running_state;
+ __entry->psci_state = proc->psci_state;
+ } else {
+ __entry->running_state = ~0;
+ __entry->psci_state = ~0;
+ }
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("affinity level: %d; MPIDR: %016llx; MIDR: %016llx; "
+ "running state: %d; PSCI state: %d",
+ __entry->affinity, __entry->mpidr, __entry->midr,
+ __entry->running_state, __entry->psci_state)
+);
+
+/*
* Non-Standard Section Report
*
* This event is generated when hardware detected a hardware
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-16 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHLXs-6QP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1642069 |
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 03:27:59PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
> Currently there are trace events for the various RAS
> errors with the exception of ARM processor type errors.
> Add a new trace event for such errors so that the user
> will know when they occur. These trace events are
> consistent with the ARM processor error section type
> defined in UEFI 2.6 spec section N.2.4.4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Reviewed-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 6 +++++-
> drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 1 +
> drivers/ras/ras.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/ras.h | 3 +++
> include/ras/ras_event.h | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 1106722..2dddb3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -518,7 +518,11 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>
> }
> #endif
> - else {
> + else if (!uuid_le_cmp(sec_type, CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM)) {
> + struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
> +
> + call_arm_trace_event(err);
> + } else {
> void *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>
> call_non_standard_trace_event(&sec_type, fru_id,
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index d5a5855..48a8f69 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include <linux/printk.h>
> #include <linux/bcd.h>
> #include <acpi/ghes.h>
> +#include <ras/ras_event.h>
>
> #define INDENT_SP " "
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ras/ras.c b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> index 57363be..8655ef4 100644
> --- a/drivers/ras/ras.c
> +++ b/drivers/ras/ras.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ void call_non_standard_trace_event(const uuid_le *sec_type,
> trace_non_standard_event(sec_type, fru_id, fru_text, sev, err, len);
> }
>
> +void call_arm_trace_event(struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err)
log_arm_hw_error()
because it is exactly that - a hardware error.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web