Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1640384 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-12 12:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-14 15:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] watchdog: pcwd_usb: fix NULL-deref at probe Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> - 2017-05-12 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] watchdog: pcwd_usb: fix NULL-deref at probe Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-05-12 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] watchdog: pcwd_usb: fix NULL-deref at probe Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> - 2017-05-14 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] watchdog: pcwd_usb: fix NULL-deref at probe Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> - 2017-05-14 15:30 +0200
| From | Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-12 12:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] watchdog: pcwd_usb: fix NULL-deref at probe |
| Message-ID | <tGg9j-36j-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Guenter and Wim,
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 07:05:46AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 04/03/2017 01:36 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:49:45PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> Make sure to check the number of endpoints to avoid dereferencing a
> >>> NULL-pointer should a malicious device lack endpoints.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> >>> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> >
> > Any progress on this one? I noticed you merged it to both the fixes and
> > next branches in your staging tree, Guenter (but it does not show up in
> > linux-next). Will you be sending it on to Linus?
> my watchdog staging trees are inofficial and not in linux-next.
> Wim is working on setting up a new server which will provide the
> official staging tree.
>
> I asked Wim to push the pending patches. I'll do it if he asks me.
I noticed Guenter's watchdog branch is now in next, but the patches for
4.12 are still not in mainline. Have you guys decided who will be
sending them on to Linus this cycle?
Thanks,
Johan
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-12 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tGm54-7o1-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1640384 |
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:36:27PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Hi Guenter and Wim,
>
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 07:05:46AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 04/03/2017 01:36 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:49:45PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > >>> Make sure to check the number of endpoints to avoid dereferencing a
> > >>> NULL-pointer should a malicious device lack endpoints.
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> > >>> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > >>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > >
> > > Any progress on this one? I noticed you merged it to both the fixes and
> > > next branches in your staging tree, Guenter (but it does not show up in
> > > linux-next). Will you be sending it on to Linus?
>
> > my watchdog staging trees are inofficial and not in linux-next.
> > Wim is working on setting up a new server which will provide the
> > official staging tree.
> >
> > I asked Wim to push the pending patches. I'll do it if he asks me.
>
> I noticed Guenter's watchdog branch is now in next, but the patches for
> 4.12 are still not in mainline. Have you guys decided who will be
> sending them on to Linus this cycle?
>
Good question. I had expected Wim to do it, since it is actually his
repository which is in linux-next. But you are correct, it isn't upstream.
Wim ?
Thanks,
Guenter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-14 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tH1rz-1YE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1640603 |
All,
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:36:27PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Hi Guenter and Wim,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 07:05:46AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 04/03/2017 01:36 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:49:45PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > >>> Make sure to check the number of endpoints to avoid dereferencing a
> > > >>> NULL-pointer should a malicious device lack endpoints.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> > > >>> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > > >>
> > > >> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > > >
> > > > Any progress on this one? I noticed you merged it to both the fixes and
> > > > next branches in your staging tree, Guenter (but it does not show up in
> > > > linux-next). Will you be sending it on to Linus?
> >
> > > my watchdog staging trees are inofficial and not in linux-next.
> > > Wim is working on setting up a new server which will provide the
> > > official staging tree.
> > >
> > > I asked Wim to push the pending patches. I'll do it if he asks me.
> >
> > I noticed Guenter's watchdog branch is now in next, but the patches for
> > 4.12 are still not in mainline. Have you guys decided who will be
> > sending them on to Linus this cycle?
> >
> Good question. I had expected Wim to do it, since it is actually his
> repository which is in linux-next. But you are correct, it isn't upstream.
Due to some issues, we (Linus, Guenter and myself) decided that Guenter will sent the pull request this time (which he allready did).
Kind regards,
Wim.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-14 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tH1KW-26q-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1641082 |
All,
> > On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:36:27PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > Hi Guenter and Wim,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 07:05:46AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > On 04/03/2017 01:36 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:16:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:49:45PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > > >>> Make sure to check the number of endpoints to avoid dereferencing a
> > > > >>> NULL-pointer should a malicious device lack endpoints.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
> > > > >>> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > > >>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> > > > >
> > > > > Any progress on this one? I noticed you merged it to both the fixes and
> > > > > next branches in your staging tree, Guenter (but it does not show up in
> > > > > linux-next). Will you be sending it on to Linus?
> > >
> > > > my watchdog staging trees are inofficial and not in linux-next.
> > > > Wim is working on setting up a new server which will provide the
> > > > official staging tree.
> > > >
> > > > I asked Wim to push the pending patches. I'll do it if he asks me.
> > >
> > > I noticed Guenter's watchdog branch is now in next, but the patches for
> > > 4.12 are still not in mainline. Have you guys decided who will be
> > > sending them on to Linus this cycle?
> > >
> > Good question. I had expected Wim to do it, since it is actually his
> > repository which is in linux-next. But you are correct, it isn't upstream.
>
> Due to some issues, we (Linus, Guenter and myself) decided that Guenter will sent the pull request this time (which he allready did).
OK, we were to late. We will line up the fixes for rc2. Feature changes and new drivers will be for next merge window.
My apologies to the people that have sent in these changes and drivers.
Kind regards,
Wim.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web