Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1640506 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] xfs: avoid harmless gcc-7 warnings

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] xfs: avoid harmless gcc-7 warnings Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-12 16:20 +0200

#1640506 — Re: [PATCH] xfs: avoid harmless gcc-7 warnings

On Thu, 2017-05-11 at 14:49 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-7 flags the use of integer math inside of a condition
> as a potential bug:
> 
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c: In function 'xfs_swap_extents_check_format':
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1619:8: error: '<<' in boolean context, did you mean '<' ? [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c:1629:8: error: '<<' in boolean context, did you mean '<' ? [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
> 
> This one is clearly fine, and we can add a comparison to zero
> to shut up the warning.
[]
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
[]
> @@ -1613,7 +1613,7 @@ xfs_swap_extents_check_format(
>  	 * extent format...
>  	 */
>  	if (tip->i_d.di_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE) {
> -		if (XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) &&
> +		if ((XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip) != 0) &&

As far as I can tell, this suggestion makes no sense.

$ git grep -E "define\s+XFS_IFORK_BOFF"
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_fork.h:#define XFS_IFORK_BOFF(ip)               ((int)((ip)->i_d.di_forkoff << 3))

$ git grep -w di_forkoff|grep -P "\w+\s+di_forkoff\s*;"
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h:	__u8		di_forkoff;	/* attr fork offs, <<3 for 64b align */
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.h:	__uint8_t	di_forkoff;	/* attr fork offs, <<3 for 64b align */
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_log_format.h:	__uint8_t	di_forkoff;	/* attr fork offs, <<3 for 64b align */

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web