Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1639227 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-11 09:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-12 08:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] KVM: Eliminate unused variable warning on uniprocessor configs Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-05-11 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] KVM: Eliminate unused variable warning on uniprocessor configs Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> - 2017-05-12 08:20 +0200
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-11 09:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] KVM: Eliminate unused variable warning on uniprocessor configs |
| Message-ID | <tFR1g-3sb-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 11/05/2017 05:40, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> When the
> kernel is compiled with CONFIG_SMP=n, smp_call_function_many() turns
> into a macro which doesn't use the 'wait' argument, leading to a
> warning about the variable 'wait' being unused:
>
> /home/paulus/kernel/kvm/arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c: In function ‘kvm_make_all_cpus_request’:
> /home/paulus/kernel/kvm/arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:195:7: error: unused variable ‘wait’ [-Werror=unused-variable]
> bool wait = req & KVM_REQUEST_WAIT;
Maybe the macro should not be a macro:
diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
index 8e0cb7a0f836..899c72f0933f 100644
--- a/include/linux/smp.h
+++ b/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -128,17 +128,18 @@ static inline void smp_send_stop(void) { }
* These macros fold the SMP functionality into a single CPU system
*/
#define raw_smp_processor_id() 0
-static inline int up_smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info)
+static inline void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
+ smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
+ bool wait);
{
- return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait);
+{
}
-#define smp_call_function(func, info, wait) \
- (up_smp_call_function(func, info))
static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { }
#define smp_prepare_boot_cpu() do {} while (0)
-#define smp_call_function_many(mask, func, info, wait) \
- (up_smp_call_function(func, info))
static inline void call_function_init(void) { }
static inline int
Paolo
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-12 08:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tGc5H-jh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1639227 |
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 09:44:06AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/05/2017 05:40, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > When the
> > kernel is compiled with CONFIG_SMP=n, smp_call_function_many() turns
> > into a macro which doesn't use the 'wait' argument, leading to a
> > warning about the variable 'wait' being unused:
> >
> > /home/paulus/kernel/kvm/arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c: In function ‘kvm_make_all_cpus_request’:
> > /home/paulus/kernel/kvm/arch/powerpc/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:195:7: error: unused variable ‘wait’ [-Werror=unused-variable]
> > bool wait = req & KVM_REQUEST_WAIT;
>
> Maybe the macro should not be a macro:
Sounds fair, and with a couple of semicolons removed, it works and
fixes the problem. Do you want to send it to the appropriate
maintainer(s) or will I?
> diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
> index 8e0cb7a0f836..899c72f0933f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/smp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/smp.h
> @@ -128,17 +128,18 @@ static inline void smp_send_stop(void) { }
> * These macros fold the SMP functionality into a single CPU system
> */
> #define raw_smp_processor_id() 0
> -static inline int up_smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info)
> +static inline void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
> + smp_call_func_t func, void *info,
> + bool wait);
No semicolon on the end of this line...
> {
> - return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void smp_call_function(smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait);
or this one.
Paul.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web