Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1638658 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-10 10:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-11 18:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2017-05-10 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-05-10 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> - 2017-05-10 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-11 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2017-05-11 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> - 2017-05-11 18:10 +0200
| From | Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-10 10:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size |
| Message-ID | <tFvtL-6TH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
We have one register for each EP to set the maximum packet size for both
TX and RX.
If for example an RX programming would happen before the previous TX
transfer finishes we would reset the TX packet side.
To fix this issue, only modify the TX or RX part of the register.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
---
drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
index db2e4c379ccf..4e1a6e4a61b8 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
@@ -389,15 +389,19 @@ static int tusb_omap_dma_program(struct dma_channel *channel, u16 packet_sz,
if (chdat->tx) {
/* Send transfer_packet_sz packets at a time */
- musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET,
- chdat->transfer_packet_sz);
+ u32 psize = musb_readl(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET);
+ psize &= ~0x7ff;
+ psize |= chdat->transfer_packet_sz;
+ musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET, psize);
musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_TX_OFFSET,
TUSB_EP_CONFIG_XFR_SIZE(chdat->transfer_len));
} else {
/* Receive transfer_packet_sz packets at a time */
- musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET,
- chdat->transfer_packet_sz << 16);
+ u32 psize = musb_readl(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET);
+ psize &= ~(0x7ff << 16);
+ psize |= (chdat->transfer_packet_sz << 16);
+ musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET, psize);
musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_RX_OFFSET,
TUSB_EP_CONFIG_XFR_SIZE(chdat->transfer_len));
--
2.12.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-10 18:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size |
| Message-ID | <tFCEV-2YC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1638658 |
* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [170510 01:45]:
> We have one register for each EP to set the maximum packet size for both
> TX and RX.
> If for example an RX programming would happen before the previous TX
> transfer finishes we would reset the TX packet side.
>
> To fix this issue, only modify the TX or RX part of the register.
Oh this is a nice one. I think we've always had this.
Bin, care to merge this one as a fix? This should have:
Fixes: 550a7375fe72 ("USB: Add MUSB and TUSB support")
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-10 19:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size |
| Message-ID | <tFDhD-3pT-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1638658 |
Hi,
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:42:27AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> We have one register for each EP to set the maximum packet size for both
> TX and RX.
> If for example an RX programming would happen before the previous TX
> transfer finishes we would reset the TX packet side.
>
> To fix this issue, only modify the TX or RX part of the register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
> index db2e4c379ccf..4e1a6e4a61b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
> @@ -389,15 +389,19 @@ static int tusb_omap_dma_program(struct dma_channel *channel, u16 packet_sz,
>
> if (chdat->tx) {
> /* Send transfer_packet_sz packets at a time */
> - musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET,
> - chdat->transfer_packet_sz);
> + u32 psize = musb_readl(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET);
checkpatch.pl complains about declaration and assignment together.
> + psize &= ~0x7ff;
> + psize |= chdat->transfer_packet_sz;
> + musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET, psize);
>
> musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_TX_OFFSET,
> TUSB_EP_CONFIG_XFR_SIZE(chdat->transfer_len));
> } else {
> /* Receive transfer_packet_sz packets at a time */
> - musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET,
> - chdat->transfer_packet_sz << 16);
> + u32 psize = musb_readl(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET);
and at here too.
> + psize &= ~(0x7ff << 16);
> + psize |= (chdat->transfer_packet_sz << 16);
> + musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET, psize);
>
> musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_RX_OFFSET,
> TUSB_EP_CONFIG_XFR_SIZE(chdat->transfer_len));
Regards,
-Bin.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-11 01:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size |
| Message-ID | <tFJ3H-6Xc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1638971 |
On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 12:07 -0500, Bin Liu wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:42:27AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > We have one register for each EP to set the maximum packet size for both
> > TX and RX.
> > If for example an RX programming would happen before the previous TX
> > transfer finishes we would reset the TX packet side.
> >
> > To fix this issue, only modify the TX or RX part of the register.
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
[]
> > @@ -389,15 +389,19 @@ static int tusb_omap_dma_program(struct dma_channel *channel, u16 packet_sz,
> >
> > if (chdat->tx) {
> > /* Send transfer_packet_sz packets at a time */
> > - musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET,
> > - chdat->transfer_packet_sz);
> > + u32 psize = musb_readl(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET);
>
> checkpatch.pl complains about declaration and assignment together.
No it doesn't.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-11 08:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size |
| Message-ID | <tFPC9-2Ew-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1639105 |
On 2017-05-11 02:16, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 12:07 -0500, Bin Liu wrote:
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:42:27AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> We have one register for each EP to set the maximum packet size for both
>>> TX and RX.
>>> If for example an RX programming would happen before the previous TX
>>> transfer finishes we would reset the TX packet side.
>>>
>>> To fix this issue, only modify the TX or RX part of the register.
> []
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
> []
>>> @@ -389,15 +389,19 @@ static int tusb_omap_dma_program(struct dma_channel *channel, u16 packet_sz,
>>>
>>> if (chdat->tx) {
>>> /* Send transfer_packet_sz packets at a time */
>>> - musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET,
>>> - chdat->transfer_packet_sz);
>>> + u32 psize = musb_readl(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET);
>>
>> checkpatch.pl complains about declaration and assignment together.
>
> No it doesn't.
It 'only' complains about:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
which is valid.
- Péter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bin Liu <b-liu@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-11 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] usb: musb: tusb6010_omap: Do not reset the other direction's packet size |
| Message-ID | <tFYP8-7g-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1639202 |
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 09:19:17AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-05-11 02:16, Joe Perches wrote:
> >On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 12:07 -0500, Bin Liu wrote:
> >>On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:42:27AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >>>We have one register for each EP to set the maximum packet size for both
> >>>TX and RX.
> >>>If for example an RX programming would happen before the previous TX
> >>>transfer finishes we would reset the TX packet side.
> >>>
> >>>To fix this issue, only modify the TX or RX part of the register.
> >[]
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c b/drivers/usb/musb/tusb6010_omap.c
> >[]
> >>>@@ -389,15 +389,19 @@ static int tusb_omap_dma_program(struct dma_channel *channel, u16 packet_sz,
> >>> if (chdat->tx) {
> >>> /* Send transfer_packet_sz packets at a time */
> >>>- musb_writel(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET,
> >>>- chdat->transfer_packet_sz);
> >>>+ u32 psize = musb_readl(ep_conf, TUSB_EP_MAX_PACKET_SIZE_OFFSET);
> >>
> >>checkpatch.pl complains about declaration and assignment together.
> >
> >No it doesn't.
>
> It 'only' complains about:
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
It was it. My bad, I was multi-tasking and didn't read the log
carefully.
>
> which is valid.
So will you update the patch to move the declaration to the beginning of
the function to avoid this WARNING. I would just fix it locally if you
prefer.
Regards,
-Bin.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web