Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1637795 > unrolled thread
| Started by | John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-09 02:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-09 17:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
ION changes in staging for 4.12 John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-05-09 02:20 +0200
Re: ION changes in staging for 4.12 Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2017-05-09 17:10 +0200
| From | John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-09 02:20 +0200 |
| Subject | ION changes in staging for 4.12 |
| Message-ID | <tF12F-2y7-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hey Laura, Wanted to check in on ION changes that landed in the staging merge for 4.12... So with these changes, I can no longer get HiKey to boot to graphics. We had previously been using the dummy ion driver, and I've added the new config entries for the various standard heaps, but it seems like things still aren't working. Was curious if this is an expected hard ABI break, or if I'm missing something, and if so, maybe how the resulting patches were tested? Is there any sort of transition document to help folks figure out what changes they might need to make to support the new ABI? thanks -john
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-09 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tFeVY-3qX-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1637795 |
On 05/08/2017 05:18 PM, John Stultz wrote: > Hey Laura, > Wanted to check in on ION changes that landed in the staging merge > for 4.12... > > So with these changes, I can no longer get HiKey to boot to graphics. > We had previously been using the dummy ion driver, and I've added the > new config entries for the various standard heaps, but it seems like > things still aren't working. > > Was curious if this is an expected hard ABI break, or if I'm missing > something, and if so, maybe how the resulting patches were tested? Is > there any sort of transition document to help folks figure out what > changes they might need to make to support the new ABI? > > thanks > -john > Yes, this was intentionally decided to be ABI breaking. It turned out to be too much of a pain to be backwards compatible and I'm not too surprised things have broken (sorry...). What I suspect is happening is that the heap ids no longer match so userspace needs to call the query ioctl to get the heap information. This is also lacking in documentation at the moment (sorry again) but should be coming soon. Thanks, Laura
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web