Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1635231 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-03 21:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-03 21:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: simplify kvm_mwait_in_guest() Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2017-05-03 21:40 +0200
| From | Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-03 21:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86: simplify kvm_mwait_in_guest() |
| Message-ID | <tD8hX-1fJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
If Intel/AMD implements MWAIT, we expect that it works well and only
reject known bugs; no reason to do it the other way around for minor
vendors. (Not that they are relevant ATM.)
This allows further simplification of kvm_mwait_in_guest().
Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 14 +++-----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
index 8ea4e80c24d1..b49add75ea35 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
@@ -216,17 +216,9 @@ static inline u64 nsec_to_cycles(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 nsec)
static inline bool kvm_mwait_in_guest(void)
{
- if (!cpu_has(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
- return false;
-
- switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor) {
- case X86_VENDOR_AMD:
- return !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_AMD_E400);
- case X86_VENDOR_INTEL:
- return !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR);
- default:
- return false;
- }
+ return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MWAIT) &&
+ !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_AMD_E400) &&
+ !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MONITOR);
}
#endif
--
2.12.2
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web