Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1633851 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-01 22:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-02 00:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] of: undeclared variable when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2017-05-01 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] of: undeclared variable when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 00:30 +0200
| From | Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-01 22:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] of: undeclared variable when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC |
| Message-ID | <tCpXz-5cq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com> wrote: > An undeclared variable was used in a macro that evaluates to nothing > when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is not defined. Change to use the correct > variable that does exist. > > --- > > reported by kbuild test robot on on robh/for-next > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/29/134 That's a bit misleading because I've not applied the offending patch. Please squash this. Rob
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-02 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tCrZn-6qo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1633851 |
On 05/01/17 14:20, Rowand, Frank wrote:
> On Monday, May 01, 2017 1:13 PM, Rob Herring [mailto:robh+dt@kernel.org] wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>> wrote:
>>> An undeclared variable was used in a macro that evaluates to nothing
>>> when CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is not defined. Change to use the correct
>>> variable that does exist.
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> reported by kbuild test robot on on robh/for-next
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/29/134
>>
>> That's a bit misleading because I've not applied the offending patch.
>> Please squash this.
>>
>> Rob
>
> Does "squash this" mean to redo the original path to include this fix?
^^^^ patch
>
> Thanks,
>
> Frank
>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web