Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1633502 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support

Started byJon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>
First post2017-05-01 00:10 +0200
Last post2017-05-02 13:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org> - 2017-05-01 00:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> - 2017-05-02 13:50 +0200

#1633502 — Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support

FromJon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>
Date2017-05-01 00:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support
Message-ID<tC5ct-rP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Jeremy,

On 06/14/2016 12:38 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:

> There are a fair number of tracepoints in the kernel making
> use of the sizeof operator. Allow perf to understand some of
> those cases, and report a more informative error message for
> the ones it cannot understand.

What's the status of this patch series? Are you planning to update?

Jon.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1634359

FromJeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Date2017-05-02 13:50 +0200
Message-ID<tCEtz-6aQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1633502
On 04/30/2017 05:06 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On 06/14/2016 12:38 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
>
>> There are a fair number of tracepoints in the kernel making
>> use of the sizeof operator. Allow perf to understand some of
>> those cases, and report a more informative error message for
>> the ones it cannot understand.
>
> What's the status of this patch series? Are you planning to update?

Hi,

Well, this series is dead. The question remains how to solve the 
problem. As the maintainers (at least in the case of arm/kvm) aren't 
interested in fixing the individual trace-points, that leaves just 
Steves's suggestion. Which hasn't yet been done. So, I guess that leaves me.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web