Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1633502 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-01 00:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-05-02 13:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org> - 2017-05-01 00:10 +0200
Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> - 2017-05-02 13:50 +0200
| From | Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-01 00:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC/PATCH] perf: Add sizeof operator support |
| Message-ID | <tC5ct-rP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Jeremy, On 06/14/2016 12:38 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote: > There are a fair number of tracepoints in the kernel making > use of the sizeof operator. Allow perf to understand some of > those cases, and report a more informative error message for > the ones it cannot understand. What's the status of this patch series? Are you planning to update? Jon.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-02 13:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tCEtz-6aQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1633502 |
On 04/30/2017 05:06 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > On 06/14/2016 12:38 PM, Jeremy Linton wrote: > >> There are a fair number of tracepoints in the kernel making >> use of the sizeof operator. Allow perf to understand some of >> those cases, and report a more informative error message for >> the ones it cannot understand. > > What's the status of this patch series? Are you planning to update? Hi, Well, this series is dead. The question remains how to solve the problem. As the maintainers (at least in the case of arm/kvm) aren't interested in fixing the individual trace-points, that leaves just Steves's suggestion. Which hasn't yet been done. So, I guess that leaves me.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web