Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1633083 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: ti: divider: try to fix ti_clk_register_divider

Started byStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
First post2017-04-28 20:40 +0200
Last post2017-04-28 20:40 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: ti: divider: try to fix ti_clk_register_divider Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-28 20:40 +0200

#1633083 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: ti: divider: try to fix ti_clk_register_divider

FromStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date2017-04-28 20:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] clk: ti: divider: try to fix ti_clk_register_divider
Message-ID<tBiYa-2Rr-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 04/22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 3:58 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > On 04/20, Tero Kristo wrote:
> >> On 19/04/17 20:44, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >> The failing piece of code is only executed for legacy boot mode
> >> OMAP3 right now, which could be potentially stripped out of the
> >> kernel already (I think Tony removed the support for non-DT boot
> >> OMAP3 boards already...?) This explains why I didn't notice the
> >> issue in my local testing either.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Fixes: d96f774b2538 ("clk: ti: divider: add support for legacy divider init")
> >> >Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >>
> >> So, this patch itself is fine, but the desc should be updated to
> >> reflect the above somehow.
> >>
> >> And the "Fixes:" line should be updated to point to the commit
> >> mentioned above also.
> >>
> >
> > Waiting for Arnd to agree. I can also rename reg_setup to reg.
> 
> Yes, it would be great if you could update the patch description that way
> so I don't have to send a new version. Thanks,
> 

Ok. I came up with something and applied it to clk-next.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web