Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1630478 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-25 15:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-26 19:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..." Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> - 2017-04-25 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..." Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2017-04-25 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..." Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-04-26 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..." Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2017-04-26 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..." Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2017-04-26 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..." Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-04-26 19:20 +0200
| From | Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-25 15:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm, arm64: fix xen_dma_ops after 815dd18 "Consolidate get_dma_ops..." |
| Message-ID | <tA8eu-4Pu-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Stefano, On 24/04/17 20:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Given the outstanding regression we need to fix as soon as possible, > I'll queue these patches on the xentip tree for 4.12. It looks like there is another rc for 4.11. I am wondering whether you could try to send a pull request to Linus so it can be fixed in 4.11? Cheers, -- Julien Grall
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-25 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAcrM-7Dc-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1630478 |
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 24/04/17 20:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Given the outstanding regression we need to fix as soon as possible, > > I'll queue these patches on the xentip tree for 4.12. > > It looks like there is another rc for 4.11. I am wondering whether you could > try to send a pull request to Linus so it can be fixed in 4.11? No, especially without input from Russell.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-26 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAtiV-1zv-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1630818 |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:22:00AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 24/04/17 20:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Given the outstanding regression we need to fix as soon as possible,
> > > I'll queue these patches on the xentip tree for 4.12.
> >
> > It looks like there is another rc for 4.11. I am wondering whether you could
> > try to send a pull request to Linus so it can be fixed in 4.11?
>
> No, especially without input from Russell.
You could add a "Fixes" tag to the first patch so that it gets
back-ported to 4.11.x once it hits mainline (the second patch is just
cosmetic):
Fixes: 815dd18788fe ("treewide: Consolidate get_dma_ops() implementations")
--
Catalin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-26 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAyBY-5dH-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1631408 |
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:22:00AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > On 24/04/17 20:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > Given the outstanding regression we need to fix as soon as possible,
> > > > I'll queue these patches on the xentip tree for 4.12.
> > >
> > > It looks like there is another rc for 4.11. I am wondering whether you could
> > > try to send a pull request to Linus so it can be fixed in 4.11?
> >
> > No, especially without input from Russell.
>
> You could add a "Fixes" tag to the first patch so that it gets
> back-ported to 4.11.x once it hits mainline (the second patch is just
> cosmetic):
>
> Fixes: 815dd18788fe ("treewide: Consolidate get_dma_ops() implementations")
I did add:
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.11+]
I thought that would be enough to trigger a backport?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-26 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAyLD-5he-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1631610 |
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:00:30AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:22:00AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > > On 24/04/17 20:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > > Given the outstanding regression we need to fix as soon as possible,
> > > > > > I'll queue these patches on the xentip tree for 4.12.
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks like there is another rc for 4.11. I am wondering whether you could
> > > > > try to send a pull request to Linus so it can be fixed in 4.11?
> > > >
> > > > No, especially without input from Russell.
> > >
> > > You could add a "Fixes" tag to the first patch so that it gets
> > > back-ported to 4.11.x once it hits mainline (the second patch is just
> > > cosmetic):
> > >
> > > Fixes: 815dd18788fe ("treewide: Consolidate get_dma_ops() implementations")
> >
> > I did add:
> >
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.11+]
> >
> > I thought that would be enough to trigger a backport?
>
> Either would do. I didn't see it in the patch you posted, that's why I
> mentioned it.
Thanks, I appreciated it!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-26 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAyLD-5he-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1631610 |
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:00:30AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2017, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:22:00AM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > On 24/04/17 20:16, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > Given the outstanding regression we need to fix as soon as possible,
> > > > > I'll queue these patches on the xentip tree for 4.12.
> > > >
> > > > It looks like there is another rc for 4.11. I am wondering whether you could
> > > > try to send a pull request to Linus so it can be fixed in 4.11?
> > >
> > > No, especially without input from Russell.
> >
> > You could add a "Fixes" tag to the first patch so that it gets
> > back-ported to 4.11.x once it hits mainline (the second patch is just
> > cosmetic):
> >
> > Fixes: 815dd18788fe ("treewide: Consolidate get_dma_ops() implementations")
>
> I did add:
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.11+]
>
> I thought that would be enough to trigger a backport?
Either would do. I didn't see it in the patch you posted, that's why I
mentioned it.
--
Catalin
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web