Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1630727 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 15/18] dt-bindings: sound: Add bindings for Cirrus Logic Madera codecs

Started byMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
First post2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
Last post2017-04-28 20:10 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 15/18] dt-bindings: sound: Add bindings for Cirrus  Logic Madera codecs Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 15/18] dt-bindings: sound: Add bindings for Cirrus  Logic Madera codecs Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2017-04-25 18:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 15/18] dt-bindings: sound: Add bindings for Cirrus  Logic Madera codecs Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-04-28 20:10 +0200

#1630727 — Re: [PATCH v2 15/18] dt-bindings: sound: Add bindings for Cirrus Logic Madera codecs

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 15/18] dt-bindings: sound: Add bindings for Cirrus Logic Madera codecs
Message-ID<tAb2G-6Ff-43@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 05:08:41PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> The Cirrus Logic Madera codecs are a family of related codecs with
> extensive digital and analogue I/O, digital mixing and routing,
> signal processing and programmable DSPs.

Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
subsystem.  This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
patches.  Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are
doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're
doing.

> +Required properties:
> +  - compatible : One of the following chip-specific strings:
> +        "cirrus,cs47l35-codec"
> +        "cirrus,cs47l85-codec"
> +        "cirrus,cs47l90-codec"

You shouldn't have compatible strings for subfunctions of a MFD unless
these represent meaningful reusable IPs that can exist separately from
the parent chip, that's clearly not the case here.  All you're doing
here is encoding Linux internal abstractions which aren't OS neutral and
might change in future (for example clocking might move more into the
clock API).

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1630750

FromRichard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date2017-04-25 18:30 +0200
Message-ID<tAbvH-74c-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1630727
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 16:52 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 05:08:41PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > The Cirrus Logic Madera codecs are a family of related codecs with
> > extensive digital and analogue I/O, digital mixing and routing,
> > signal processing and programmable DSPs.
> 
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem.  This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
> patches.  Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are
> doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're
> doing.
> 
> > +Required properties:
> > +  - compatible : One of the following chip-specific strings:
> > +        "cirrus,cs47l35-codec"
> > +        "cirrus,cs47l85-codec"
> > +        "cirrus,cs47l90-codec"
> 
> You shouldn't have compatible strings for subfunctions of a MFD unless
> these represent meaningful reusable IPs that can exist separately from
> the parent chip, that's clearly not the case here.  All you're doing
> here is encoding Linux internal abstractions which aren't OS neutral and
> might change in future (for example clocking might move more into the
> clock API).

While that's nice, the of_node doesn't get populated if there isn't a
compatible string. And people don't like workarounds for the missing
of_node.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1633063

FromRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date2017-04-28 20:10 +0200
Message-ID<tBiv7-2EY-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1630727
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 04:52:57PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 05:08:41PM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> > The Cirrus Logic Madera codecs are a family of related codecs with
> > extensive digital and analogue I/O, digital mixing and routing,
> > signal processing and programmable DSPs.
> 
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem.  This makes it easier for people to identify relevant
> patches.  Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are
> doing and make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're
> doing.
> 
> > +Required properties:
> > +  - compatible : One of the following chip-specific strings:
> > +        "cirrus,cs47l35-codec"
> > +        "cirrus,cs47l85-codec"
> > +        "cirrus,cs47l90-codec"
> 
> You shouldn't have compatible strings for subfunctions of a MFD unless
> these represent meaningful reusable IPs that can exist separately from
> the parent chip, that's clearly not the case here.  All you're doing
> here is encoding Linux internal abstractions which aren't OS neutral and
> might change in future (for example clocking might move more into the
> clock API).

s/compatible strings/child nodes/ and I agree. If you have child nodes, 
then they need to have compatible strings so we can tell what child is 
which. Node name can be used, but there's no way to version node names. 
A compatible implies what properties are valid.

Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web