Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1632192 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add --typedefsfile

Started byJerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
First post2017-04-27 17:50 +0200
Last post2017-04-27 18:10 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add --typedefsfile Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org> - 2017-04-27 17:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add --typedefsfile Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-27 18:10 +0200

#1632192 — Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add --typedefsfile

FromJerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
Date2017-04-27 17:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] checkpatch: add --typedefsfile
Message-ID<tATQ6-2Ak-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 04/21/2017 08:31 AM, Jerome Forissier wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 06:49 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 17:39 +0200, Jerome Forissier wrote:
>>> When using checkpatch on out-of-tree code, it may occur that some
>>> project-specific types are used, which will cause spurious warnings.
>>> Add the --typedefsfile option as a way to extend the known types and
>>> deal with this issue.
>>
>> I'm not opposed to the addition.
>> What out-of-tree project is this for?
> 
> OP-TEE [1]. We run a Travis job on all pull requests [2], and checkpatch
> is part of that. The typical false warning we get on a regular basis is
> with some pointers to functions returning TEE_Result [3], which is a
> typedef from the GlobalPlatform APIs. We consider it is acceptable to
> use GP types in the OP-TEE core implementation, that's why this patch
> would be helpful for us.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os
> [2] https://travis-ci.org/OP-TEE/optee_os/builds
> [3] https://travis-ci.org/OP-TEE/optee_os/builds/193355335#L1733 

Ping?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1632223

FromJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date2017-04-27 18:10 +0200
Message-ID<tAU9r-2Zz-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1632192
On Thu, 2017-04-27 at 17:41 +0200, Jerome Forissier wrote:
> On 04/21/2017 08:31 AM, Jerome Forissier wrote:
> > On 04/20/2017 06:49 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 17:39 +0200, Jerome Forissier wrote:
> > > > When using checkpatch on out-of-tree code, it may occur that some
> > > > project-specific types are used, which will cause spurious warnings.
> > > > Add the --typedefsfile option as a way to extend the known types and
> > > > deal with this issue.
> > > 
> > > I'm not opposed to the addition.
> > > What out-of-tree project is this for?
> > 
> > OP-TEE [1]. We run a Travis job on all pull requests [2], and checkpatch
> > is part of that. The typical false warning we get on a regular basis is
> > with some pointers to functions returning TEE_Result [3], which is a
> > typedef from the GlobalPlatform APIs. We consider it is acceptable to
> > use GP types in the OP-TEE core implementation, that's why this patch
> > would be helpful for us.
> > 
> > [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os
> > [2] https://travis-ci.org/OP-TEE/optee_os/builds
> > [3] https://travis-ci.org/OP-TEE/optee_os/builds/193355335#L1733 
> 
> Ping?

It's a well written patch.

But I'll leave it up to Andrew Morton to accept/reject this.

I'm not opposed to it though as it seems reasonable because
using a checkpatch command-line --ignore=NEW_TYPEDEFS may
not be the right solution for your use case.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web