Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1632027 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-27 13:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2017-04-27 14:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH net-next] mlx5: work around unused function warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-27 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx5: work around unused function warning Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-27 14:10 +0200
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-27 13:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH net-next] mlx5: work around unused function warning |
| Message-ID | <tAPt7-86a-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The previous patch addressed a sparse warning but replaced it with a
compiler warning when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib.c:485:13: error: 'mlx5_rdma_netdev_free' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib.c:423:27: error: 'mlx5_rdma_netdev_alloc' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
We should never export 'static' functions, so this makes them global
again but hides them in another #ifdef like the change before.
Fixes: a7082ef066f0 ("mlx5: hide unused functions")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib.c
index 3c84e36af018..eb48f112dff4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib.c
@@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int mlx5i_xmit(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
return mlx5i_sq_xmit(sq, skb, &mah->av, dqpn, dqkey);
}
-#endif
static int mlx5i_check_required_hca_cap(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
{
@@ -420,10 +419,10 @@ static int mlx5i_check_required_hca_cap(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
return 0;
}
-static struct net_device *mlx5_rdma_netdev_alloc(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,
- struct ib_device *ibdev,
- const char *name,
- void (*setup)(struct net_device *))
+struct net_device *mlx5_rdma_netdev_alloc(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,
+ struct ib_device *ibdev,
+ const char *name,
+ void (*setup)(struct net_device *))
{
const struct mlx5e_profile *profile = &mlx5i_nic_profile;
int nch = profile->max_nch(mdev);
@@ -482,7 +481,7 @@ static struct net_device *mlx5_rdma_netdev_alloc(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mlx5_rdma_netdev_alloc);
-static void mlx5_rdma_netdev_free(struct net_device *netdev)
+void mlx5_rdma_netdev_free(struct net_device *netdev)
{
struct mlx5e_priv *priv = mlx5i_epriv(netdev);
const struct mlx5e_profile *profile = priv->profile;
@@ -495,4 +494,4 @@ static void mlx5_rdma_netdev_free(struct net_device *netdev)
mlx5e_destroy_mdev_resources(priv->mdev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(mlx5_rdma_netdev_free);
-
+#endif
--
2.9.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-04-27 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAQpb-ol-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1632027 |
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 01:04:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> The previous patch addressed a sparse warning but replaced it with a
>> compiler warning when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled:
>>
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib.c:485:13: error: 'mlx5_rdma_netdev_free' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/ipoib.c:423:27: error: 'mlx5_rdma_netdev_alloc' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
>>
>> We should never export 'static' functions, so this makes them global
>> again but hides them in another #ifdef like the change before.
>>
>> Fixes: a7082ef066f0 ("mlx5: hide unused functions")
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> Thanks for the patch, but Stephen and Saeed already sent patch similar to it.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=149288674816288&w=2
That link is for the patch that introduced the warning that I'm fixing here,
it showed up yesterday in linux-next.
Did you misread my patch, or just give the wrong link?
Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web