Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1632001 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb/migration: Use set_huge_pte_at instead of set_pte_at

Started byNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
First post2017-04-27 11:50 +0200
Last post2017-04-27 11:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb/migration: Use set_huge_pte_at instead  of set_pte_at Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> - 2017-04-27 11:50 +0200

#1632001 — Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb/migration: Use set_huge_pte_at instead of set_pte_at

FromNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date2017-04-27 11:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb/migration: Use set_huge_pte_at instead of set_pte_at
Message-ID<tAOdI-76j-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:41:40PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> The right interface to use to set a hugetlb pte entry is set_huge_pte_at. Use
> that instead of set_pte_at.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web