Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1578726 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add Kabylake support

Started bySrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
First post2017-02-10 20:10 +0100
Last post2017-02-10 20:30 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add Kabylake support Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-10 20:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add Kabylake support Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-02-10 20:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add Kabylake support Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2017-02-10 20:30 +0100

#1578726 — [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add Kabylake support

FromSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date2017-02-10 20:10 +0100
Subject[PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Add Kabylake support
Message-ID<t9oJX-7y4-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Added Kabylake mobile and desktop models for rapl, cstates and uncore.
They should be same as Skylake.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c | 3 +++
 arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c   | 3 +++
 arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c
index 1076c9a..aff4b5b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/cstate.c
@@ -541,6 +541,9 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_cstates_match[] __initconst = {
 	X86_CSTATES_MODEL(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE,  snb_cstates),
 	X86_CSTATES_MODEL(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP, snb_cstates),
 
+	X86_CSTATES_MODEL(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,  snb_cstates),
+	X86_CSTATES_MODEL(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_DESKTOP, snb_cstates),
+
 	X86_CSTATES_MODEL(INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNL, knl_cstates),
 	X86_CSTATES_MODEL(INTEL_FAM6_XEON_PHI_KNM, knl_cstates),
 	{ },
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
index 22ef4f7..22054ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
@@ -771,6 +771,9 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_match[] __initconst = {
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP, skl_rapl_init),
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X,	 hsx_rapl_init),
 
+	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,  skl_rapl_init),
+	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_DESKTOP, skl_rapl_init),
+
 	X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT, hsw_rapl_init),
 	{},
 };
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index 1ab4597..758c1aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -1328,6 +1328,8 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id intel_uncore_match[] __initconst = {
 	X86_UNCORE_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP,skl_uncore_init),
 	X86_UNCORE_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE, skl_uncore_init),
 	X86_UNCORE_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X,      skx_uncore_init),
+	X86_UNCORE_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE, skl_uncore_init),
+	X86_UNCORE_MODEL_MATCH(INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_DESKTOP, skl_uncore_init),
 	{},
 };
 
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1578732

FromThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date2017-02-10 20:20 +0100
Message-ID<t9oTE-7BA-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1578726
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:

> Added Kabylake mobile and desktop models for rapl, cstates and uncore.
> They should be same as Skylake.

Should be the same? Either they are or they are not.

Thanks,

	tglx

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1578742

FromSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date2017-02-10 20:30 +0100
Message-ID<t9p3j-7EV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1578732
On Fri, 2017-02-10 at 20:16 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> 
> > Added Kabylake mobile and desktop models for rapl, cstates and
> > uncore.
> > They should be same as Skylake.
> 
> Should be the same? Either they are or they are not.
They are same. OK I will send an update.

Thanks,
Srinivas

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web