Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1578523 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-02-10 15:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-02-10 18:10 +0100
    RE: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> - 2017-02-10 20:20 +0100
      RE: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com> - 2017-02-12 07:00 +0100

#1578523 — Re: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state

On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 05:20:35PM -0700, kys@exchange.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> 
> The netvsc no longer needs per channel state hook to track receive buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/hyperv.h |   14 --------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

This patch breaks the build badly, I don't know how it passed anyone's
build tests :(

The functions are still used in two different files.

I've applied the first 4 patches here, but really, I shouldn't have had
to bisect down to the offending patch.

ugh.

greg k-h

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1578625

On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 04:39:02PM +0000, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> In the set I submitted was the patch to remove usage of per channel state in netvsc.

Ah.

> KY dropped it, because it already is in net-next. So this patch can wait until net-next is merged.
> The current split tree process is a pain and causes slow development cycles

Ick, I offered up a way to do this, but it doesn't look like KY or
anyone else took me up on it :(

sorry,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1578741

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] 
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 6:47 AM
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; olaf@aepfle.de; apw@canonical.com; vkuznets@redhat.com; jasowang@redhat.com; leann.ogasawara@canonical.com; Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>; Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state

On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 05:20:35PM -0700, kys@exchange.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> 
> The netvsc no longer needs per channel state hook to track receive buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/hyperv.h |   14 --------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

This patch breaks the build badly, I don't know how it passed anyone's
build tests :(

The functions are still used in two different files.

I've applied the first 4 patches here, but really, I shouldn't have had
to bisect down to the offending patch.

ugh.

greg k-h

In the set I submitted was the patch to remove usage of per channel state in netvsc.
KY dropped it, because it already is in net-next. So this patch can wait until net-next is merged.
The current split tree process is a pain and causes slow development cycles

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1579165

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 8:39 AM
> To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>; KY Srinivasan
> <kys@microsoft.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org;
> olaf@aepfle.de; apw@canonical.com; vkuznets@redhat.com;
> jasowang@redhat.com; leann.ogasawara@canonical.com; Stephen
> Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 6:47 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org;
> olaf@aepfle.de; apw@canonical.com; vkuznets@redhat.com;
> jasowang@redhat.com; leann.ogasawara@canonical.com; Stephen
> Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] vmbus: remove per channel state
> 
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 05:20:35PM -0700, kys@exchange.microsoft.com
> wrote:
> > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> >
> > The netvsc no longer needs per channel state hook to track receive buffer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
> > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/hyperv.h |   14 --------------
> >  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> This patch breaks the build badly, I don't know how it passed anyone's
> build tests :(
> 
> The functions are still used in two different files.
> 
> I've applied the first 4 patches here, but really, I shouldn't have had
> to bisect down to the offending patch.
> 
> ugh.
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> In the set I submitted was the patch to remove usage of per channel state in
> netvsc.
> KY dropped it, because it already is in net-next. So this patch can wait until
> net-next is merged.
> The current split tree process is a pain and causes slow development cycles

Greg,

Sorry for the confusion; I will be resending the rest of the patches.

Thanks,

K. Y

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web