Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1570333 > unrolled thread

Re: [PULL v2] ARM: DTS: Fix broken GICv2 register maps

Started byOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
First post2017-01-31 06:40 +0100
Last post2017-02-07 15:10 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PULL v2] ARM: DTS: Fix broken GICv2 register maps Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2017-01-31 06:40 +0100
    Re: [PULL v2] ARM: DTS: Fix broken GICv2 register maps Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-01-31 10:50 +0100
      Re: [PULL v2] ARM: DTS: Fix broken GICv2 register maps Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-02-07 15:10 +0100

#1570333 — Re: [PULL v2] ARM: DTS: Fix broken GICv2 register maps

FromOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Date2017-01-31 06:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PULL v2] ARM: DTS: Fix broken GICv2 register maps
Message-ID<t5zkC-5dd-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Marc, 

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 08:53:09AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> ARM-soc folks,
> 
> Please find below the pull request for a DT fix affecting a large
> number of 32bit platforms, which has been acked by a number of
> platform maintainers.
> 
> * From v1: Dropped the controvertial cortex-a15-gic->arm,gic-400
>   change in the example, at Rob's request.
> 
> The following changes since commit 49def1853334396f948dcb4cedb9347abb318df5:
> 
>   Linux 4.10-rc4 (2017-01-15 16:21:59 -0800)

Any reason you had to base this on -rc4? We usually stick to an older -rc
for all our branches, this cycle it's -rc3.

Care to respin? Or I can just pick over the patches, as long as you don't
need them as a stable base somewhere else.


-Olof

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1570534

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-01-31 10:50 +0100
Message-ID<t5Dey-7w7-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1570333
On Tue, Jan 31 2017 at 05:06:48 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
> Hi Marc, 
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 08:53:09AM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> ARM-soc folks,
>> 
>> Please find below the pull request for a DT fix affecting a large
>> number of 32bit platforms, which has been acked by a number of
>> platform maintainers.
>> 
>> * From v1: Dropped the controvertial cortex-a15-gic->arm,gic-400
>>   change in the example, at Rob's request.
>> 
>> The following changes since commit 49def1853334396f948dcb4cedb9347abb318df5:
>> 
>>   Linux 4.10-rc4 (2017-01-15 16:21:59 -0800)
>
> Any reason you had to base this on -rc4? We usually stick to an older
> -rc for all our branches, this cycle it's -rc3.

Ah, damn... No reason, just what I had at hand at the time this was put
together.

> Care to respin? Or I can just pick over the patches, as long as you
> don't need them as a stable base somewhere else.

If that works for you, please cherry pick the patches. I don't need them
to be based on anything in particular.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1575760

FromArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date2017-02-07 15:10 +0100
Message-ID<t8eD0-3TA-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1570534
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31 2017 at 05:06:48 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>
>> Care to respin? Or I can just pick over the patches, as long as you
>> don't need them as a stable base somewhere else.
>
> If that works for you, please cherry pick the patches. I don't need them
> to be based on anything in particular.
>

Applied both to next/dt now, thanks for the cleanup!

     Arnd

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web