Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1577264 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rick Chang <rick.chang@mediatek.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-09 03:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-13 11:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder Rick Chang <rick.chang@mediatek.com> - 2017-02-09 03:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> - 2017-02-13 11:50 +0100
| From | Rick Chang <rick.chang@mediatek.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-09 03:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder |
| Message-ID | <t8MuZ-8o2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Hans, All the dependences of this patch have been merged into v4.10-next.Could you take v9 of this patch set? Matthias will help us to take the dts part. Best Regards, Rick On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 16:02 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > Hi James, > > On 10/01/17 02:28, Eddie Huang wrote: > > Hi Matthias, > > > > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 19:45 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > >> > >> On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >>> Hi Rick, > >>> > >>> On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote: > >>>> Hi Hans, > >>>> > >>>> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have > >>>> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge > >>>> the source code and dt-binding first? > >>> > >>> Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason > >>> it hasn't been merged yet? > >>> > >>> If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media > >>> patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle. > >>> > >>> If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is > >>> merged. > >>> > >> > >> I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems > >> that it got never posted. > >> > >> Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds > >> a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi? > >> > > > > James sent three MT2701 dts patches [1] two weeks ago, these three > > patches include scpsys node. Please take a reference. And We will send > > new MT2701 ionmmu/smi dtsi node patch base on [1] later, thus you can > > accept and merge to 4.11. > > > > Thanks for the clarification. I pulled all this patches into > v4.10-next/dts32 > > Hans will you take v9 of this patch set? > Then I'll take the dts patch. > > Regards, > Matthias > > > [1] > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489991/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489985/ > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489989/ > > > > Thanks, > > Eddie > > > >
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-13 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <tammK-2yB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1577264 |
Hi Rick, On 02/09/2017 03:10 AM, Rick Chang wrote: > Hi Hans, > > All the dependences of this patch have been merged into v4.10-next.Could > you take v9 of this patch set? Matthias will help us to take the dts > part. Apologies for the delay. I'm posting the pull request today, but I don't know if Mauro will pick it up for 4.11. Mauro, since this needs to be coordinated with Matthias can you let him know whether this will go in for 4.11 or 4.12? Regards, Hans > > Best Regards, > Rick > > On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 16:02 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> Hi James, >> >> On 10/01/17 02:28, Eddie Huang wrote: >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>> On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 19:45 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: >>>> >>>> On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>>>> Hi Rick, >>>>> >>>>> On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote: >>>>>> Hi Hans, >>>>>> >>>>>> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have >>>>>> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge >>>>>> the source code and dt-binding first? >>>>> >>>>> Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason >>>>> it hasn't been merged yet? >>>>> >>>>> If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media >>>>> patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle. >>>>> >>>>> If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is >>>>> merged. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems >>>> that it got never posted. >>>> >>>> Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds >>>> a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi? >>>> >>> >>> James sent three MT2701 dts patches [1] two weeks ago, these three >>> patches include scpsys node. Please take a reference. And We will send >>> new MT2701 ionmmu/smi dtsi node patch base on [1] later, thus you can >>> accept and merge to 4.11. >>> >> >> Thanks for the clarification. I pulled all this patches into >> v4.10-next/dts32 >> >> Hans will you take v9 of this patch set? >> Then I'll take the dts patch. >> >> Regards, >> Matthias >> >>> [1] >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489991/ >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489985/ >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489989/ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Eddie >>> >>> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web