Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1573690 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/7] Implement generic regulator constraints parsing for ACPI and OF

Started byMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
First post2017-02-04 17:10 +0100
Last post2017-02-04 17:10 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/7] Implement generic regulator constraints parsing for  ACPI and OF Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-02-04 17:10 +0100

#1573690 — Re: [PATCH 0/7] Implement generic regulator constraints parsing for ACPI and OF

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2017-02-04 17:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] Implement generic regulator constraints parsing for ACPI and OF
Message-ID<t7b4t-2Ps-5@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:35:55AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> but that doesn't work if drivers expect to be able to control regulators directly
> (which BTW isn't an good idea overall IMO, because that may need to be done
> differently on different platforms even without ACPI AFAICS).

We've really not encountered anything that has any issues here outside
of what's supported in the constraints already (basically what voltages
can be set and if the supply can be turned on and off).  I'd be pretty
surprised if we did TBH, it's hard to do something radically different
with a single piece of silicon which is the abstraction level we tend to
be operating at if we are controlling regulators.  AFAICT a higher level
of abstraction is generally going to go along with physically hiding the
regulators even in a DT world.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web