Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1575005 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-06 18:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-07 15:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] mm: Place "not" inside of unlikely() statement in wb_domain_writeout_inc() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-06 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm: Place "not" inside of unlikely() statement in wb_domain_writeout_inc() Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2017-02-07 15:40 +0100
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-06 18:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] mm: Place "not" inside of unlikely() statement in wb_domain_writeout_inc() |
| Message-ID | <t7UXE-7LS-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
The likely/unlikely profiler noticed that the unlikely statement in
wb_domain_writeout_inc() is constantly wrong. This is due to the "not" (!)
being outside the unlikely statement. It is likely that dom->period_time
will be set, but unlikely that it wont be. Move the not into the unlikely
statement.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 290e8b7..94102c7 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static void wb_domain_writeout_inc(struct wb_domain *dom,
__fprop_inc_percpu_max(&dom->completions, completions,
max_prop_frac);
/* First event after period switching was turned off? */
- if (!unlikely(dom->period_time)) {
+ if (unlikely(!dom->period_time)) {
/*
* We can race with other __bdi_writeout_inc calls here but
* it does not cause any harm since the resulting time when
--
2.9.3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-07 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t8f62-45q-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1575005 |
On Mon 06-02-17 12:00:35, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> The likely/unlikely profiler noticed that the unlikely statement in
> wb_domain_writeout_inc() is constantly wrong. This is due to the "not" (!)
> being outside the unlikely statement. It is likely that dom->period_time
> will be set, but unlikely that it wont be. Move the not into the unlikely
> statement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Yeah, good catch. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Andrew, will you merge this patch please? Thanks!
Honza
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 290e8b7..94102c7 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static void wb_domain_writeout_inc(struct wb_domain *dom,
> __fprop_inc_percpu_max(&dom->completions, completions,
> max_prop_frac);
> /* First event after period switching was turned off? */
> - if (!unlikely(dom->period_time)) {
> + if (unlikely(!dom->period_time)) {
> /*
> * We can race with other __bdi_writeout_inc calls here but
> * it does not cause any harm since the resulting time when
> --
> 2.9.3
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web