Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1572541 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-02 18:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-02 22:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> - 2017-02-02 18:40 +0100
Re: Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> - 2017-02-02 19:30 +0100
[REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> - 2017-02-02 21:00 +0100
Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> - 2017-02-02 22:00 +0100
Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> - 2017-02-02 22:10 +0100
| From | Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-02 18:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl |
| Message-ID | <t6twu-6ZQ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello, Please consider reverting commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. It was included upstream as of v4.7-rc1 This commit introduced a regression, described in the following bug: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918 This new regression was discussed in the following thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/6/467 Sincerely, Joseph Salisbury
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-02 19:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t6uiR-7xo-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1572541 |
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > Hello, > > Please consider reverting commit > 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. What release can I remove it from? It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's reverted in Linus's tree already? totally confused. greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-02 21:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl |
| Message-ID | <t6vHX-8jY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1572586 |
On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please consider reverting commit >> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. > What release can I remove it from? > > It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's > reverted in Linus's tree already? > > totally confused. > > greg k-h Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in mainline in v4.7-rc1. The request should be only for kernels newer than 4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10. I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline. I updated the subject. Thanks, Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-02 22:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl |
| Message-ID | <t6wE2-ua-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1572717 |
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:58:16PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Please consider reverting commit > >> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. > > What release can I remove it from? > > > > It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's > > reverted in Linus's tree already? > > > > totally confused. > > > > greg k-h > > Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in > mainline in v4.7-rc1. The request should be only for kernels newer than > 4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10. > > I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline. Let me know when it is reverted, and what that revert commit is please. thanks, greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-02 22:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl |
| Message-ID | <t6wNH-No-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1572747 |
On 02/02/2017 03:57 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:58:16PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Please consider reverting commit >>>> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. >>> What release can I remove it from? >>> >>> It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's >>> reverted in Linus's tree already? >>> >>> totally confused. >>> >>> greg k-h >> Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in >> mainline in v4.7-rc1. The request should be only for kernels newer than >> 4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10. >> >> I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline. > Let me know when it is reverted, and what that revert commit is please. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Will do. Thanks again, Joe
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web