Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1571996 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] kprobes: move kprobe declarations to asm-generic/kprobes.h

Started by"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
First post2017-02-01 22:50 +0100
Last post2017-02-04 00:30 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] kprobes: move kprobe declarations to  asm-generic/kprobes.h "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-02-01 22:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] kprobes: move kprobe declarations to  asm-generic/kprobes.h Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-02-02 04:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] kprobes: move kprobe declarations to  asm-generic/kprobes.h "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-02-04 00:30 +0100

#1571996 — Re: [PATCH] kprobes: move kprobe declarations to asm-generic/kprobes.h

From"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date2017-02-01 22:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kprobes: move kprobe declarations to asm-generic/kprobes.h
Message-ID<t6aWR-3dV-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:47:35PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> OK, then it is OK to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

Aha, actually I *did* send this out separately already :) --
who's tree should this go through ?

  Luis

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1572127

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2017-02-02 04:10 +0100
Message-ID<t6fWx-6tX-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1571996
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 22:46:04 +0100
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:47:35PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > OK, then it is OK to me.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>  
> 
> Aha, actually I *did* send this out separately already :) --
> who's tree should this go through ?

This hits a lot of archs. Perhaps it should go through the default
tree... Andrew?

-- Steve

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1573522

From"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Date2017-02-04 00:30 +0100
Message-ID<t6VsJ-7S-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1572127
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:00:57PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 22:46:04 +0100
> "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:47:35PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > OK, then it is OK to me.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>  
> > 
> > Aha, actually I *did* send this out separately already :) --
> > who's tree should this go through ?
> 
> This hits a lot of archs. Perhaps it should go through the default
> tree... Andrew?

Sure, will rebase and send again.

  Luis

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web