Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1573562 > unrolled thread
| Started by | OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-04 02:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-04 02:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH resend 3/4] nfc: Fix RC-S380* needs zero-length packet OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> - 2017-02-04 02:20 +0100
[PATCH resend 4/4] nfc: Fix hangup of RC-S380* in port100_send_ack() OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> - 2017-02-04 02:20 +0100
| From | OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-04 02:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH resend 3/4] nfc: Fix RC-S380* needs zero-length packet |
| Message-ID | <t6Xbb-1uM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
If sent packet size is wMaxPacketSize boundary, this device doesn't answer. To fix this, we have to send zero-length packet in usb spec. Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> --- drivers/nfc/port100.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff -puN drivers/nfc/port100.c~nfc-need-zero-packet drivers/nfc/port100.c --- linux-ibmpc/drivers/nfc/port100.c~nfc-need-zero-packet 2016-12-31 18:27:14.814753508 +0900 +++ linux-ibmpc-hirofumi/drivers/nfc/port100.c 2016-12-31 18:32:12.928334607 +0900 @@ -1540,6 +1540,7 @@ static int port100_probe(struct usb_inte usb_fill_bulk_urb(dev->out_urb, dev->udev, usb_sndbulkpipe(dev->udev, out_endpoint), NULL, 0, port100_send_complete, dev); + dev->out_urb->transfer_flags = URB_ZERO_PACKET; dev->skb_headroom = PORT100_FRAME_HEADER_LEN + PORT100_COMM_RF_HEAD_MAX_LEN; _ -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-04 02:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH resend 4/4] nfc: Fix hangup of RC-S380* in port100_send_ack() |
| Message-ID | <t6Xbb-1uM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1573562 |
If port100_send_ack() was called twice or more, it has race to hangup.
port100_send_ack() port100_send_ack()
init_completion()
[...]
dev->cmd_cancel = true
/* this removes previous from completion */
init_completion()
[...]
dev->cmd_cancel = true
wait_for_completion()
/* never be waked up */
wait_for_completion()
Like above race, this code is not assuming port100_send_ack() is
called twice or more.
To fix, this checks dev->cmd_cancel to know if prior cancel is
in-flight or not. And never be remove prior task from completion by
using reinit_completion(), so this guarantees to be waked up properly
soon or later.
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
---
drivers/nfc/port100.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff -puN drivers/nfc/port100.c~nfc-port100-hang-fix drivers/nfc/port100.c
--- linux-ibmpc/drivers/nfc/port100.c~nfc-port100-hang-fix 2017-01-03 12:32:13.261785257 +0900
+++ linux-ibmpc-hirofumi/drivers/nfc/port100.c 2017-01-03 12:33:51.965364300 +0900
@@ -726,23 +726,33 @@ static int port100_submit_urb_for_ack(st
static int port100_send_ack(struct port100 *dev)
{
- int rc;
+ int rc = 0;
mutex_lock(&dev->out_urb_lock);
- init_completion(&dev->cmd_cancel_done);
-
- usb_kill_urb(dev->out_urb);
+ /*
+ * If prior cancel is in-flight (dev->cmd_cancel == true), we
+ * can skip to send cancel. Then this will wait the prior
+ * cancel, or merged into the next cancel rarely if next
+ * cancel was started before waiting done. In any case, this
+ * will be waked up soon or later.
+ */
+ if (!dev->cmd_cancel) {
+ reinit_completion(&dev->cmd_cancel_done);
- dev->out_urb->transfer_buffer = ack_frame;
- dev->out_urb->transfer_buffer_length = sizeof(ack_frame);
- rc = usb_submit_urb(dev->out_urb, GFP_KERNEL);
+ usb_kill_urb(dev->out_urb);
- /* Set the cmd_cancel flag only if the URB has been successfully
- * submitted. It will be reset by the out URB completion callback
- * port100_send_complete().
- */
- dev->cmd_cancel = !rc;
+ dev->out_urb->transfer_buffer = ack_frame;
+ dev->out_urb->transfer_buffer_length = sizeof(ack_frame);
+ rc = usb_submit_urb(dev->out_urb, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ /*
+ * Set the cmd_cancel flag only if the URB has been
+ * successfully submitted. It will be reset by the out
+ * URB completion callback port100_send_complete().
+ */
+ dev->cmd_cancel = !rc;
+ }
mutex_unlock(&dev->out_urb_lock);
@@ -929,8 +939,8 @@ static void port100_send_complete(struct
struct port100 *dev = urb->context;
if (dev->cmd_cancel) {
+ complete_all(&dev->cmd_cancel_done);
dev->cmd_cancel = false;
- complete(&dev->cmd_cancel_done);
}
switch (urb->status) {
@@ -1546,6 +1556,7 @@ static int port100_probe(struct usb_inte
PORT100_COMM_RF_HEAD_MAX_LEN;
dev->skb_tailroom = PORT100_FRAME_TAIL_LEN;
+ init_completion(&dev->cmd_cancel_done);
INIT_WORK(&dev->cmd_complete_work, port100_wq_cmd_complete);
/* The first thing to do with the Port-100 is to set the command type
_
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web