Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1573343 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-02-03 19:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-03 19:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: mm: Fix NOMAP page initialization Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-02-03 19:20 +0100
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-03 19:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: mm: Fix NOMAP page initialization |
| Message-ID | <t6QCK-5b2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:14:14PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote: > On 17.01.17 19:16:56, Will Deacon wrote: > > I can't really see the trend given that, for system time, your > > pfn_valid_within results have a variance of ~9 and the early_pfn_valid > > results have a variance of ~92. Given that the variance seems to come > > about due to the reboots, I think we need more numbers to establish whether > > the data sets end up largely overlapping or if they really are disjoint. > > Assuming the numbers of both versions are not significant, please > apply one or the other. I'd rather apply the pfn_valid_within version, but please can you Ack the patch first, since there was some confusion when it was posted about a translation fault that was never reproduced. Thanks, Will
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web