Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1573023 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v6: 2/4] x86: Add enabling of the R3MWAIT during boot

Started byPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
First post2017-02-03 11:50 +0100
Last post2017-02-03 12:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v6: 2/4] x86: Add enabling of the R3MWAIT during boot Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-02-03 11:50 +0100
    RE: [PATCH v6: 2/4] x86: Add enabling of the R3MWAIT during boot "Andrejczuk, Grzegorz" <grzegorz.andrejczuk@intel.com> - 2017-02-03 12:30 +0100

#1573023 — Re: [PATCH v6: 2/4] x86: Add enabling of the R3MWAIT during boot

FromPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date2017-02-03 11:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6: 2/4] x86: Add enabling of the R3MWAIT during boot
Message-ID<t6JBf-ru-5@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri 2016-12-09 12:49:33, Andrejczuk, Grzegorz wrote:
> > > On Thu 2016-10-27 16:38:13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Grzegorz Andrejczuk wrote:
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > > > +static int phi_r3mwait_disabled __read_mostly;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static int __init phir3mwait_disable(char *__unused) {
> > > > > +	phi_r3mwait_disabled = 1;
> > > > > +	pr_warn("x86/phir3mwait: Disabled ring 3 MWAIT for Xeon Phi");
> > > > 
> > > > Why would that be a warning? The sysadmin added the command line 
> > > > switch, so why does he needs to be warned?
> > > 
> > > Its telling admin he did not make a typo on the command line. We often do that....
> >
> > Definitely not at the warning level.
> 
> Is info level OK for that message?

I'd say so.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1573036

From"Andrejczuk, Grzegorz" <grzegorz.andrejczuk@intel.com>
Date2017-02-03 12:30 +0100
Message-ID<t6KdX-Xs-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1573023
On Friday, February 3, 2017 11:48 AM Pavel wrote:
> > Is info level OK for that message?
>
> I'd say so.

Thanks, I will update patch.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web