Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1571308 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer interrupt level

Started byChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
First post2017-02-01 09:10 +0100
Last post2017-02-01 11:10 +0100
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer  interrupt level Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> - 2017-02-01 09:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer  interrupt level Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> - 2017-02-01 09:50 +0100
      Re: [RFC v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer  interrupt level Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> - 2017-02-01 11:10 +0100
        Re: [RFC v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer  interrupt level Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-02-01 11:20 +0100
    Re: [RFC v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer  interrupt level Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-02-01 11:10 +0100

#1571308 — Re: [RFC v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer interrupt level

FromChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Date2017-02-01 09:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [RFC v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer interrupt level
Message-ID<t5Y9j-3lP-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:21:06PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27 2017 at 01:04:56 AM, Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
> > Now that we maintain the EL1 physical timer register states of VMs,
> > update the physical timer interrupt level along with the virtual one.
> >
> > Note that the emulated EL1 physical timer is not mapped to any hardware
> > timer, so we call a proper vgic function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> > ---
> >  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> > index 0f6e935..3b6bd50 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> > @@ -180,6 +180,21 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
> >  	WARN_ON(ret);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
> > +				 struct arch_timer_context *timer)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm));
> 
> Although I've added my fair share of BUG_ON() in the code base, I've
> since reconsidered my position. If we get in a situation where the vgic
> is not initialized, maybe it would be better to just WARN_ON and return
> early rather than killing the whole box. Thoughts?
> 

Could we help this series along by saying that since this BUG_ON already
exists in the kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq function, then it just
preserves functionality and it's up to someone else (me) to remove the
BUG_ON from both functions later in life?

Thanks,
-Christoffer

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1571333

FromJintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
Date2017-02-01 09:50 +0100
Message-ID<t5YM2-3z5-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1571308
On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Christoffer Dall
<christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:21:06PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 27 2017 at 01:04:56 AM, Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
>> > Now that we maintain the EL1 physical timer register states of VMs,
>> > update the physical timer interrupt level along with the virtual one.
>> >
>> > Note that the emulated EL1 physical timer is not mapped to any hardware
>> > timer, so we call a proper vgic function.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
>> > ---
>> >  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>> > index 0f6e935..3b6bd50 100644
>> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>> > @@ -180,6 +180,21 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
>> >     WARN_ON(ret);
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
>> > +                            struct arch_timer_context *timer)
>> > +{
>> > +   int ret;
>> > +
>> > +   BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm));
>>
>> Although I've added my fair share of BUG_ON() in the code base, I've
>> since reconsidered my position. If we get in a situation where the vgic
>> is not initialized, maybe it would be better to just WARN_ON and return
>> early rather than killing the whole box. Thoughts?
>>
>
> Could we help this series along by saying that since this BUG_ON already
> exists in the kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq function, then it just
> preserves functionality and it's up to someone else (me) to remove the
> BUG_ON from both functions later in life?
>

Sounds good to me :) Thanks!

> Thanks,
> -Christoffer
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1571446

FromChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Date2017-02-01 11:10 +0100
Message-ID<t601v-4A9-119@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1571333
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:40:10AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Christoffer Dall
> <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:21:06PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 27 2017 at 01:04:56 AM, Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
> >> > Now that we maintain the EL1 physical timer register states of VMs,
> >> > update the physical timer interrupt level along with the virtual one.
> >> >
> >> > Note that the emulated EL1 physical timer is not mapped to any hardware
> >> > timer, so we call a proper vgic function.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> >> > ---
> >> >  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> >> > index 0f6e935..3b6bd50 100644
> >> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> >> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> >> > @@ -180,6 +180,21 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
> >> >     WARN_ON(ret);
> >> >  }
> >> >
> >> > +static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
> >> > +                            struct arch_timer_context *timer)
> >> > +{
> >> > +   int ret;
> >> > +
> >> > +   BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm));
> >>
> >> Although I've added my fair share of BUG_ON() in the code base, I've
> >> since reconsidered my position. If we get in a situation where the vgic
> >> is not initialized, maybe it would be better to just WARN_ON and return
> >> early rather than killing the whole box. Thoughts?
> >>
> >
> > Could we help this series along by saying that since this BUG_ON already
> > exists in the kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq function, then it just
> > preserves functionality and it's up to someone else (me) to remove the
> > BUG_ON from both functions later in life?
> >
> 
> Sounds good to me :) Thanks!
> 

So just as you thought you were getting off easy...

The reason we now have kvm_timer_update_irq and
kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq is that we have the following two vgic
functions:

kvm_vgic_inject_irq
kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq

But the only difference between the two is what they pass
as the mapped_irq argument to vgic_update_irq_pending.

What about if we just had this as a precursor patch:

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
index 6a084cd..91ecf48 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
@@ -175,7 +175,8 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level)
 	timer->irq.level = new_level;
 	trace_kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu->vcpu_id, timer->irq.irq,
 				   timer->irq.level);
-	ret = kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
+
+	ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
 					 timer->irq.irq,
 					 timer->irq.level);
 	WARN_ON(ret);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index dea12df..4c87fd0 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -336,8 +336,7 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq)
 }
 
 static int vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
-				   unsigned int intid, bool level,
-				   bool mapped_irq)
+				   unsigned int intid, bool level)
 {
 	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
 	struct vgic_irq *irq;
@@ -357,11 +356,6 @@ static int vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
 	if (!irq)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (irq->hw != mapped_irq) {
-		vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
 
 	if (!vgic_validate_injection(irq, level)) {
@@ -399,13 +393,7 @@ static int vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
 int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
 			bool level)
 {
-	return vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, intid, level, false);
-}
-
-int kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
-			       bool level)
-{
-	return vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, intid, level, true);
+	return vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, intid, level);
 }
 
 int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq)


That would make this patch simpler.  If so, I can send out the above
patch with a proper description.

Thanks,
-Christoffer

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1571447

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-02-01 11:20 +0100
Message-ID<t60b8-4DF-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1571446
On 01/02/17 10:07, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:40:10AM -0500, Jintack Lim wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Christoffer Dall
>> <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:21:06PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 27 2017 at 01:04:56 AM, Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
>>>>> Now that we maintain the EL1 physical timer register states of VMs,
>>>>> update the physical timer interrupt level along with the virtual one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that the emulated EL1 physical timer is not mapped to any hardware
>>>>> timer, so we call a proper vgic function.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>>>> index 0f6e935..3b6bd50 100644
>>>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>>>> @@ -180,6 +180,21 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
>>>>>     WARN_ON(ret);
>>>>>  }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
>>>>> +                            struct arch_timer_context *timer)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +   int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +   BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm));
>>>>
>>>> Although I've added my fair share of BUG_ON() in the code base, I've
>>>> since reconsidered my position. If we get in a situation where the vgic
>>>> is not initialized, maybe it would be better to just WARN_ON and return
>>>> early rather than killing the whole box. Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Could we help this series along by saying that since this BUG_ON already
>>> exists in the kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq function, then it just
>>> preserves functionality and it's up to someone else (me) to remove the
>>> BUG_ON from both functions later in life?
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good to me :) Thanks!
>>
> 
> So just as you thought you were getting off easy...
> 
> The reason we now have kvm_timer_update_irq and
> kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq is that we have the following two vgic
> functions:
> 
> kvm_vgic_inject_irq
> kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq
> 
> But the only difference between the two is what they pass
> as the mapped_irq argument to vgic_update_irq_pending.
> 
> What about if we just had this as a precursor patch:
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index 6a084cd..91ecf48 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,8 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level)
>  	timer->irq.level = new_level;
>  	trace_kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu->vcpu_id, timer->irq.irq,
>  				   timer->irq.level);
> -	ret = kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
> +
> +	ret = kvm_vgic_inject_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu->vcpu_id,
>  					 timer->irq.irq,
>  					 timer->irq.level);
>  	WARN_ON(ret);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index dea12df..4c87fd0 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -336,8 +336,7 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq)
>  }
>  
>  static int vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
> -				   unsigned int intid, bool level,
> -				   bool mapped_irq)
> +				   unsigned int intid, bool level)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>  	struct vgic_irq *irq;
> @@ -357,11 +356,6 @@ static int vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
>  	if (!irq)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (irq->hw != mapped_irq) {
> -		vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
>  	spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock);
>  
>  	if (!vgic_validate_injection(irq, level)) {
> @@ -399,13 +393,7 @@ static int vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
>  int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
>  			bool level)
>  {
> -	return vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, intid, level, false);
> -}
> -
> -int kvm_vgic_inject_mapped_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid,
> -			       bool level)
> -{
> -	return vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, intid, level, true);
> +	return vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, intid, level);
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_vgic_map_phys_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 virt_irq, u32 phys_irq)
> 
> 
> That would make this patch simpler.  If so, I can send out the above
> patch with a proper description.

Indeed. And while you're at it, rename vgic_update_irq_pending to
kvm_vgic_inject_irq, as I don't think we need this simple stub?

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1571442

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2017-02-01 11:10 +0100
Message-ID<t601v-4A9-103@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1571308
On 01/02/17 08:04, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:21:06PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 27 2017 at 01:04:56 AM, Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
>>> Now that we maintain the EL1 physical timer register states of VMs,
>>> update the physical timer interrupt level along with the virtual one.
>>>
>>> Note that the emulated EL1 physical timer is not mapped to any hardware
>>> timer, so we call a proper vgic function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
>>> ---
>>>  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>> index 0f6e935..3b6bd50 100644
>>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
>>> @@ -180,6 +180,21 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
>>>  	WARN_ON(ret);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> +static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level,
>>> +				 struct arch_timer_context *timer)
>>> +{
>>> +	int ret;
>>> +
>>> +	BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm));
>>
>> Although I've added my fair share of BUG_ON() in the code base, I've
>> since reconsidered my position. If we get in a situation where the vgic
>> is not initialized, maybe it would be better to just WARN_ON and return
>> early rather than killing the whole box. Thoughts?
>>
> 
> Could we help this series along by saying that since this BUG_ON already
> exists in the kvm_timer_update_mapped_irq function, then it just
> preserves functionality and it's up to someone else (me) to remove the
> BUG_ON from both functions later in life?

Works for me.

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web