Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1570211 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-31 01:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-31 03:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v3 21/24] media: imx: Add MIPI CSI-2 Receiver subdev driver Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-01-31 01:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 21/24] media: imx: Add MIPI CSI-2 Receiver subdev driver Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 03:20 +0100
| From | Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-31 01:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 21/24] media: imx: Add MIPI CSI-2 Receiver subdev driver |
| Message-ID | <t5uNY-2l4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 06:11:39PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-mipi-csi2.c ... > +#define DEVICE_NAME "imx6-mipi-csi2" Why is the device/driver named imx6-mipi-csi2, but the module named imx-mipi-csi2 - could there be some consistency here please? Thanks. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-31 03:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t5wd3-3iE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1570211 |
On 01/30/2017 04:31 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 06:11:39PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote: >> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-mipi-csi2.c > ... >> +#define DEVICE_NAME "imx6-mipi-csi2" > Why is the device/driver named imx6-mipi-csi2, but the module named > imx-mipi-csi2 - could there be some consistency here please? right, that was missed after renaming the device node. Fixed. Steve
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web