Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1570428 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-31 07:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-02-02 14:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@intel.com> - 2017-01-31 07:20 +0100
Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 23:10 +0100
Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@intel.com> - 2017-02-02 14:30 +0100
| From | "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-31 07:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings |
| Message-ID | <t5zXj-5GO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 1/26/2017 23:19, Philippe Reynes wrote:
> The ethtool api {get|set}_settings is deprecated.
> We move this driver to new api {get|set}_link_ksettings.
>
> As I don't have the hardware, I'd be very pleased if
> someone may test this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c | 91 ++++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
> index 7aff68a..3768a5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ethtool.c
> @@ -117,15 +117,15 @@ struct e1000_stats {
>
> #define E1000_TEST_LEN ARRAY_SIZE(e1000_gstrings_test)
>
> -static int e1000_get_settings(struct net_device *netdev,
> - struct ethtool_cmd *ecmd)
> +static int e1000_get_link_ksettings(struct net_device *netdev,
> + struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd)
> {
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> - u32 speed;
> + u32 speed, supported, advertising;
>
> if (hw->phy.media_type == e1000_media_type_copper) {
> - ecmd->supported = (SUPPORTED_10baseT_Half |
> + supported = (SUPPORTED_10baseT_Half |
> SUPPORTED_10baseT_Full |
> SUPPORTED_100baseT_Half |
> SUPPORTED_100baseT_Full |
> @@ -133,39 +133,36 @@ static int e1000_get_settings(struct net_device *netdev,
> SUPPORTED_Autoneg |
> SUPPORTED_TP);
> if (hw->phy.type == e1000_phy_ife)
> - ecmd->supported &= ~SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Full;
> - ecmd->advertising = ADVERTISED_TP;
> + supported &= ~SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Full;
> + advertising = ADVERTISED_TP;
>
> if (hw->mac.autoneg == 1) {
> - ecmd->advertising |= ADVERTISED_Autoneg;
> + advertising |= ADVERTISED_Autoneg;
> /* the e1000 autoneg seems to match ethtool nicely */
> - ecmd->advertising |= hw->phy.autoneg_advertised;
> + advertising |= hw->phy.autoneg_advertised;
> }
>
> - ecmd->port = PORT_TP;
> - ecmd->phy_address = hw->phy.addr;
> - ecmd->transceiver = XCVR_INTERNAL;
> -
> + cmd->base.port = PORT_TP;
> + cmd->base.phy_address = hw->phy.addr;
> } else {
> - ecmd->supported = (SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Full |
> + supported = (SUPPORTED_1000baseT_Full |
> SUPPORTED_FIBRE |
> SUPPORTED_Autoneg);
>
> - ecmd->advertising = (ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Full |
> + advertising = (ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Full |
> ADVERTISED_FIBRE |
> ADVERTISED_Autoneg);
>
> - ecmd->port = PORT_FIBRE;
> - ecmd->transceiver = XCVR_EXTERNAL;
> + cmd->base.port = PORT_FIBRE;
> }
>
> speed = SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> - ecmd->duplex = DUPLEX_UNKNOWN;
> + cmd->base.duplex = DUPLEX_UNKNOWN;
>
> if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> if (netif_carrier_ok(netdev)) {
> speed = adapter->link_speed;
> - ecmd->duplex = adapter->link_duplex - 1;
> + cmd->base.duplex = adapter->link_duplex - 1;
> }
> } else if (!pm_runtime_suspended(netdev->dev.parent)) {
> u32 status = er32(STATUS);
> @@ -179,30 +176,36 @@ static int e1000_get_settings(struct net_device *netdev,
> speed = SPEED_10;
>
> if (status & E1000_STATUS_FD)
> - ecmd->duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
> + cmd->base.duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
> else
> - ecmd->duplex = DUPLEX_HALF;
> + cmd->base.duplex = DUPLEX_HALF;
> }
> }
>
> - ethtool_cmd_speed_set(ecmd, speed);
> - ecmd->autoneg = ((hw->phy.media_type == e1000_media_type_fiber) ||
> + cmd->base.speed = speed;
> + cmd->base.autoneg = ((hw->phy.media_type == e1000_media_type_fiber) ||
> hw->mac.autoneg) ? AUTONEG_ENABLE : AUTONEG_DISABLE;
>
> /* MDI-X => 2; MDI =>1; Invalid =>0 */
> if ((hw->phy.media_type == e1000_media_type_copper) &&
> netif_carrier_ok(netdev))
> - ecmd->eth_tp_mdix = hw->phy.is_mdix ? ETH_TP_MDI_X : ETH_TP_MDI;
> + cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix = hw->phy.is_mdix ?
> + ETH_TP_MDI_X : ETH_TP_MDI;
> else
> - ecmd->eth_tp_mdix = ETH_TP_MDI_INVALID;
> + cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix = ETH_TP_MDI_INVALID;
>
> if (hw->phy.mdix == AUTO_ALL_MODES)
> - ecmd->eth_tp_mdix_ctrl = ETH_TP_MDI_AUTO;
> + cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix_ctrl = ETH_TP_MDI_AUTO;
> else
> - ecmd->eth_tp_mdix_ctrl = hw->phy.mdix;
> + cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix_ctrl = hw->phy.mdix;
>
> if (hw->phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper)
> - ecmd->eth_tp_mdix_ctrl = ETH_TP_MDI_INVALID;
> + cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix_ctrl = ETH_TP_MDI_INVALID;
> +
> + ethtool_convert_legacy_u32_to_link_mode(cmd->link_modes.supported,
> + supported);
> + ethtool_convert_legacy_u32_to_link_mode(cmd->link_modes.advertising,
> + advertising);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -262,12 +265,16 @@ static int e1000_set_spd_dplx(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u32 spd, u8 dplx)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -static int e1000_set_settings(struct net_device *netdev,
> - struct ethtool_cmd *ecmd)
> +static int e1000_set_link_ksettings(struct net_device *netdev,
> + const struct ethtool_link_ksettings *cmd)
> {
> struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> int ret_val = 0;
> + u32 advertising;
> +
> + ethtool_convert_link_mode_to_legacy_u32(&advertising,
> + cmd->link_modes.advertising);
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(netdev->dev.parent);
>
> @@ -285,14 +292,14 @@ static int e1000_set_settings(struct net_device *netdev,
> * some hardware doesn't allow MDI setting when speed or
> * duplex is forced.
> */
> - if (ecmd->eth_tp_mdix_ctrl) {
> + if (cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix_ctrl) {
> if (hw->phy.media_type != e1000_media_type_copper) {
> ret_val = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if ((ecmd->eth_tp_mdix_ctrl != ETH_TP_MDI_AUTO) &&
> - (ecmd->autoneg != AUTONEG_ENABLE)) {
> + if ((cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix_ctrl != ETH_TP_MDI_AUTO) &&
> + (cmd->base.autoneg != AUTONEG_ENABLE)) {
> e_err("forcing MDI/MDI-X state is not supported when link speed and/or duplex are forced\n");
> ret_val = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> @@ -302,35 +309,35 @@ static int e1000_set_settings(struct net_device *netdev,
> while (test_and_set_bit(__E1000_RESETTING, &adapter->state))
> usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>
> - if (ecmd->autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE) {
> + if (cmd->base.autoneg == AUTONEG_ENABLE) {
> hw->mac.autoneg = 1;
> if (hw->phy.media_type == e1000_media_type_fiber)
> hw->phy.autoneg_advertised = ADVERTISED_1000baseT_Full |
> ADVERTISED_FIBRE | ADVERTISED_Autoneg;
> else
> - hw->phy.autoneg_advertised = ecmd->advertising |
> + hw->phy.autoneg_advertised = advertising |
> ADVERTISED_TP | ADVERTISED_Autoneg;
> - ecmd->advertising = hw->phy.autoneg_advertised;
> + advertising = hw->phy.autoneg_advertised;
> if (adapter->fc_autoneg)
> hw->fc.requested_mode = e1000_fc_default;
> } else {
> - u32 speed = ethtool_cmd_speed(ecmd);
> + u32 speed = cmd->base.speed;
> /* calling this overrides forced MDI setting */
> - if (e1000_set_spd_dplx(adapter, speed, ecmd->duplex)) {
> + if (e1000_set_spd_dplx(adapter, speed, cmd->base.duplex)) {
> ret_val = -EINVAL;
> goto out;
> }
> }
>
> /* MDI-X => 2; MDI => 1; Auto => 3 */
> - if (ecmd->eth_tp_mdix_ctrl) {
> + if (cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix_ctrl) {
> /* fix up the value for auto (3 => 0) as zero is mapped
> * internally to auto
> */
> - if (ecmd->eth_tp_mdix_ctrl == ETH_TP_MDI_AUTO)
> + if (cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix_ctrl == ETH_TP_MDI_AUTO)
> hw->phy.mdix = AUTO_ALL_MODES;
> else
> - hw->phy.mdix = ecmd->eth_tp_mdix_ctrl;
> + hw->phy.mdix = cmd->base.eth_tp_mdix_ctrl;
> }
>
> /* reset the link */
> @@ -2313,8 +2320,6 @@ static int e1000e_get_ts_info(struct net_device *netdev,
> }
>
> static const struct ethtool_ops e1000_ethtool_ops = {
> - .get_settings = e1000_get_settings,
> - .set_settings = e1000_set_settings,
> .get_drvinfo = e1000_get_drvinfo,
> .get_regs_len = e1000_get_regs_len,
> .get_regs = e1000_get_regs,
> @@ -2342,6 +2347,8 @@ static int e1000e_get_ts_info(struct net_device *netdev,
> .get_ts_info = e1000e_get_ts_info,
> .get_eee = e1000e_get_eee,
> .set_eee = e1000e_set_eee,
> + .get_link_ksettings = e1000_get_link_ksettings,
> + .set_link_ksettings = e1000_set_link_ksettings,
> };
>
> void e1000e_set_ethtool_ops(struct net_device *netdev)
Philippe,
We will look into and try test this patch. I would like ask question. I
see that this thread has been started from implementation for e1000
code. Why do you decide shift implementation to e1000e?
Sasha
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Philippe Reynes <tremyfr@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-31 23:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH] net: intel: e1000e: use new api ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings |
| Message-ID | <t5OMF-69o-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1570428 |
Hi Sasha, On 1/31/17, Neftin, Sasha <sasha.neftin@intel.com> wrote: > > Philippe, > > We will look into and try test this patch. I would like ask question. I > see that this thread has been started from implementation for e1000 > code. Why do you decide shift implementation to e1000e? I've just sent two patch for two drivers (e1000 and e1000e). > Sasha > > Philippe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-02 14:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t6pCz-4Bc-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1571163 |
On 2/1/2017 00:01, Philippe Reynes wrote: > Hi Sasha, > > On 1/31/17, Neftin, Sasha <sasha.neftin@intel.com> wrote: >> Philippe, >> >> We will look into and try test this patch. I would like ask question. I >> see that this thread has been started from implementation for e1000 >> code. Why do you decide shift implementation to e1000e? > I've just sent two patch for two drivers (e1000 and e1000e). > > >> Sasha >> >> > Philippe Hello Philippe, Great. We are responsible for e1000e. We will check patch for e1000e. Sasha
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web