Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1570540 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-31 11:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-31 14:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: stmmac: GMAC_RGSMIIIS reports bogus values Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> - 2017-01-31 11:00 +0100
Re: stmmac: GMAC_RGSMIIIS reports bogus values Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> - 2017-01-31 14:30 +0100
Re: stmmac: GMAC_RGSMIIIS reports bogus values Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> - 2017-01-31 14:50 +0100
| From | Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-31 11:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: stmmac: GMAC_RGSMIIIS reports bogus values |
| Message-ID | <t5Doe-7zo-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 1/27/2017 11:23 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > That's why my initial proposal was to ignore whatever we read from this register > if we have MDIO bus instantiated already. sorry for my late reply, I agree with this approach, according to the HW and platform configuration the driver has to understand and then work to use either SMA or PCS module. Regards Peppe
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-31 14:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t5GFs-1cI-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1570540 |
Hi Giuseppe, On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 10:55 +0100, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > On 1/27/2017 11:23 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > > > > That's why my initial proposal was to ignore whatever we read from this register > > if we have MDIO bus instantiated already. > > sorry for my late reply, I agree with this approach, according to the > HW and platform configuration the driver has to understand and then > work to use either SMA or PCS module. I already submitted another solution which IMHO is much cleaner and appropriate, see David has it already in master tree here: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=0a764db103376cf69d04449b10688f3516cc0b88 -Alexey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-31 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t5GYO-1ja-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1570744 |
Hello Alexey On 1/31/2017 2:24 PM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Giuseppe, > > On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 10:55 +0100, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: >> On 1/27/2017 11:23 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote: >>> >>> That's why my initial proposal was to ignore whatever we read from this register >>> if we have MDIO bus instantiated already. >> >> sorry for my late reply, I agree with this approach, according to the >> HW and platform configuration the driver has to understand and then >> work to use either SMA or PCS module. > > I already submitted another solution which IMHO is much cleaner and appropriate, > see David has it already in master tree here: > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=0a764db103376cf69d04449b10688f3516cc0b88 > it's ok, thx for that Peppe > -Alexey >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web