Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1568206 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-27 12:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-27 12:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 3.12 192/235] ARM: ux500: fix prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi() calculation Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> - 2017-01-27 12:40 +0100
| From | Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-27 12:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 3.12 192/235] ARM: ux500: fix prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi() calculation |
| Message-ID | <t4d2O-3w5-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
===============
commit f0e8faa7a5e894b0fc99d24be1b18685a92ea466 upstream.
This function clearly never worked and always returns true,
as pointed out by gcc-7:
arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c: In function 'prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi':
arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c:137:212: error: ?:
using integer constants in boolean context, the expression
will always evaluate to 'true' [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
With the added braces, the condition actually makes sense.
Fixes: 34fe6f107eab ("mfd : Check if the other db8500 core is in WFI")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c
index 1a468f0fd22e..9d532568b8b3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/pm.c
@@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ bool prcmu_pending_irq(void)
*/
bool prcmu_is_cpu_in_wfi(int cpu)
{
- return readl(PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY) & cpu ? PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI1 :
- PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI0;
+ return readl(PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY) &
+ (cpu ? PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI1 : PRCM_ARM_WFI_STANDBY_WFI0);
}
/*
--
2.11.0
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web