Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1565643 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-24 09:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-25 10:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v3 3/13] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2017-01-24 09:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 3/13] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64 Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> - 2017-01-24 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3 3/13] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-01-25 10:20 +0100
| From | Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-24 09:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/13] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64 |
| Message-ID | <t34uF-1Q8-67@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 16 January 2017 at 17:56, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Experience have shown that the using the autocalibration could severely
> degrade the performances of the MMC bus.
>
> Allwinner is using in its BSP a delay set to 0 for all the modes but HS400.
> Remove the calibration code for now, and add comments to document our
> findings.
So doesn't this break some platforms using HS400? Or are you saying
those are already broken?
Kind regards
Uffe
>
> Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 50 ++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> index 019f95e8e7c5..b9c8a62bc212 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
> @@ -683,41 +683,19 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>
> static int sunxi_mmc_calibrate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, int reg_off)
> {
> - u32 reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off);
> - u32 delay;
> - unsigned long timeout;
> -
> if (!host->cfg->can_calibrate)
> return 0;
>
> - reg &= ~(SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT);
> - reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
> -
> - writel(reg | SDXC_CAL_START, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -
> - dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration started\n");
> -
> - timeout = jiffies + HZ * SDXC_CAL_TIMEOUT;
> -
> - while (!((reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off)) & SDXC_CAL_DONE)) {
> - if (time_before(jiffies, timeout))
> - cpu_relax();
> - else {
> - reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
> - writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -
> - return -ETIMEDOUT;
> - }
> - }
> -
> - delay = (reg >> SDXC_CAL_DL_SHIFT) & SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK;
> -
> - reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
> - reg |= (delay << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT) | SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
> -
> - writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
> -
> - dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration ended, reg is 0x%x\n", reg);
> + /*
> + * FIXME:
> + * This is not clear how the calibration is supposed to work
> + * yet. The best rate have been obtained by simply setting the
> + * delay to 0, as Allwinner does in its BSP.
> + *
> + * The only mode that doesn't have such a delay is HS400, that
> + * is in itself a TODO.
> + */
> + writel(SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN, host->reg_base + reg_off);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -809,7 +787,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_clk_set_rate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - /* TODO: enable calibrate on sdc2 SDXC_REG_DS_DL_REG of A64 */
> + /*
> + * FIXME:
> + *
> + * In HS400 we'll also need to calibrate the data strobe
> + * signal. This should only happen on the MMC2 controller (at
> + * least on the A64).
> + */
>
> return sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(host, 1);
> }
> --
> git-series 0.8.11
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-24 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t35qF-2qR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1565643 |
Hi Ulf,
On 24/01/17 08:16, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 16 January 2017 at 17:56, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> Experience have shown that the using the autocalibration could severely
>> degrade the performances of the MMC bus.
>>
>> Allwinner is using in its BSP a delay set to 0 for all the modes but HS400.
>> Remove the calibration code for now, and add comments to document our
>> findings.
>
> So doesn't this break some platforms using HS400? Or are you saying
> those are already broken?
This is a sunxi specific calibration routine, which was introduced
lately (e1b8dfd1b1c6) to be used by the Allwinner's enhanced MMC
controller. This is only used by devices using the sun50i-a64-mmc
compatible, of which this series introduces the first user.
So there is no way this can regress in any way, since the code wasn't
actually used before.
Cheers,
Andre.
>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c | 50 ++++++++++++-------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
>> index 019f95e8e7c5..b9c8a62bc212 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sunxi-mmc.c
>> @@ -683,41 +683,19 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, u32 oclk_en)
>>
>> static int sunxi_mmc_calibrate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host, int reg_off)
>> {
>> - u32 reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off);
>> - u32 delay;
>> - unsigned long timeout;
>> -
>> if (!host->cfg->can_calibrate)
>> return 0;
>>
>> - reg &= ~(SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT);
>> - reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
>> -
>> - writel(reg | SDXC_CAL_START, host->reg_base + reg_off);
>> -
>> - dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration started\n");
>> -
>> - timeout = jiffies + HZ * SDXC_CAL_TIMEOUT;
>> -
>> - while (!((reg = readl(host->reg_base + reg_off)) & SDXC_CAL_DONE)) {
>> - if (time_before(jiffies, timeout))
>> - cpu_relax();
>> - else {
>> - reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
>> - writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
>> -
>> - return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> - delay = (reg >> SDXC_CAL_DL_SHIFT) & SDXC_CAL_DL_MASK;
>> -
>> - reg &= ~SDXC_CAL_START;
>> - reg |= (delay << SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_SHIFT) | SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN;
>> -
>> - writel(reg, host->reg_base + reg_off);
>> -
>> - dev_dbg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "calibration ended, reg is 0x%x\n", reg);
>> + /*
>> + * FIXME:
>> + * This is not clear how the calibration is supposed to work
>> + * yet. The best rate have been obtained by simply setting the
>> + * delay to 0, as Allwinner does in its BSP.
>> + *
>> + * The only mode that doesn't have such a delay is HS400, that
>> + * is in itself a TODO.
>> + */
>> + writel(SDXC_CAL_DL_SW_EN, host->reg_base + reg_off);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -809,7 +787,13 @@ static int sunxi_mmc_clk_set_rate(struct sunxi_mmc_host *host,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - /* TODO: enable calibrate on sdc2 SDXC_REG_DS_DL_REG of A64 */
>> + /*
>> + * FIXME:
>> + *
>> + * In HS400 we'll also need to calibrate the data strobe
>> + * signal. This should only happen on the MMC2 controller (at
>> + * least on the A64).
>> + */
>>
>> return sunxi_mmc_oclk_onoff(host, 1);
>> }
>> --
>> git-series 0.8.11
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-25 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t3rUd-8k5-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1565643 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi Ulf, On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 16 January 2017 at 17:56, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: > > Experience have shown that the using the autocalibration could severely > > degrade the performances of the MMC bus. > > > > Allwinner is using in its BSP a delay set to 0 for all the modes but HS400. > > Remove the calibration code for now, and add comments to document our > > findings. > > So doesn't this break some platforms using HS400? Or are you saying > those are already broken? Like Andre said, HS400 isn't supported at all, so there's no regression or brokenness involved :) Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web