Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1566233 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] zh_CN/CodingStyle: Convert to ReST markup

Started byJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
First post2017-01-25 01:00 +0100
Last post2017-01-25 01:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/2] zh_CN/CodingStyle: Convert to ReST markup Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-01-25 01:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] zh_CN/CodingStyle: Convert to ReST markup Andy Deng <theandy.deng@gmail.com> - 2017-01-25 01:30 +0100

#1566233 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] zh_CN/CodingStyle: Convert to ReST markup

FromJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Date2017-01-25 01:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] zh_CN/CodingStyle: Convert to ReST markup
Message-ID<t3jai-2yy-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 07:54:21 +0800
Andy Deng <theandy.deng@gmail.com> wrote:

> This commit applies all changes from the English version, and should
> be able to work with documentation build system.
> 
> Also fixed some translation errors.

So I approve of all of this, to the extent that I can understand it.  But
can we split the two above changes into two separate patches, just on
general principles?  They are two distinct changes, after all.

Thanks,

jon

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1566247

FromAndy Deng <theandy.deng@gmail.com>
Date2017-01-25 01:30 +0100
Message-ID<t3jDj-2XM-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1566233
2017-01-25 7:57 GMT+08:00 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>:
>
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 07:54:21 +0800
> Andy Deng <theandy.deng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This commit applies all changes from the English version, and should
> > be able to work with documentation build system.
> >
> > Also fixed some translation errors.
>
> So I approve of all of this, to the extent that I can understand it.  But
> can we split the two above changes into two separate patches, just on
> general principles?  They are two distinct changes, after all.


Thanks for your review! I will separate this patch, and send again later.

Regards,
Andy

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web