Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1566223 > unrolled thread

[RFC][PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Reduce asynchronous request_firmware to auto-boot only

Started bySarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>
First post2017-01-25 00:20 +0100
Last post2017-01-25 00:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [RFC][PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Reduce asynchronous request_firmware to auto-boot only Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-01-25 00:20 +0100
    [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Modify the function names Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2017-01-25 00:20 +0100

#1566223 — [RFC][PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Reduce asynchronous request_firmware to auto-boot only

FromSarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>
Date2017-01-25 00:20 +0100
Subject[RFC][PATCH 1/2] remoteproc: Reduce asynchronous request_firmware to auto-boot only
Message-ID<t3ixz-2kV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
The rproc_add_virtio_devices() requests firmware asynchronously and
triggers boot if the auto_boot flag is set. However, this
asynchronous call seems to be redundant for non auto-boot scenario
since the rproc_boot() would call request_firmware() anyways. Move
the auto_boot check to rproc_add() so that a redundant call to
_request_firmware can be avoided for non auto-boot case.

Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>
---

I'm requesting RFC on this patch since I'm not aware of any scenario
where we might need asynchronous firmware loading for non auto-boot case.

 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index f58e634..16242b0 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -970,9 +970,7 @@ static void rproc_fw_config_virtio(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
 {
 	struct rproc *rproc = context;
 
-	/* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */
-	if (rproc->auto_boot)
-		rproc_boot(rproc);
+	rproc_boot(rproc);
 
 	release_firmware(fw);
 }
@@ -1286,9 +1284,13 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	/* create debugfs entries */
 	rproc_create_debug_dir(rproc);
-	ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ret;
+
+	/* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */
+	if (rproc->auto_boot) {
+		ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc);
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	/* expose to rproc_get_by_phandle users */
 	mutex_lock(&rproc_list_mutex);
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1566225 — [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Modify the function names

FromSarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>
Date2017-01-25 00:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Modify the function names
Message-ID<t3ixA-2kV-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1566223
The functions rproc_add_virtio_devices() and
rproc_fw_config_virtio() are reduced to trigger auto-boot
only. Modify these function names and related comments to
reflect their current state.

This patch does not add any functional change.

Signed-off-by: Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 16242b0..c6b1d4a 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -959,14 +959,14 @@ static int rproc_fw_boot(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 }
 
 /*
- * take a firmware and look for virtio devices to register.
+ * take a firmware and boot it up.
  *
  * Note: this function is called asynchronously upon registration of the
  * remote processor (so we must wait until it completes before we try
  * to unregister the device. one other option is just to use kref here,
  * that might be cleaner).
  */
-static void rproc_fw_config_virtio(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
+static void rproc_auto_boot_callback(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
 {
 	struct rproc *rproc = context;
 
@@ -975,21 +975,17 @@ static void rproc_fw_config_virtio(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
 	release_firmware(fw);
 }
 
-static int rproc_add_virtio_devices(struct rproc *rproc)
+static int rproc_trigger_auto_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
-	 * We must retrieve early virtio configuration info from
-	 * the firmware (e.g. whether to register a virtio device,
-	 * what virtio features does it support, ...).
-	 *
 	 * We're initiating an asynchronous firmware loading, so we can
 	 * be built-in kernel code, without hanging the boot process.
 	 */
 	ret = request_firmware_nowait(THIS_MODULE, FW_ACTION_HOTPLUG,
 				      rproc->firmware, &rproc->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
-				      rproc, rproc_fw_config_virtio);
+				      rproc, rproc_auto_boot_callback);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "request_firmware_nowait err: %d\n", ret);
 
@@ -1287,7 +1283,7 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 	/* if rproc is marked always-on, request it to boot */
 	if (rproc->auto_boot) {
-		ret = rproc_add_virtio_devices(rproc);
+		ret = rproc_trigger_auto_boot(rproc);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 	}
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web