Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1567236 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 2/3] perf: Do error out on a kernel filter on an exclude_filter event

Started byAlexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
First post2017-01-26 10:50 +0100
Last post2017-01-26 19:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 2/3] perf: Do error out on a kernel filter on an exclude_filter event Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-26 10:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Do error out on a kernel filter on an  exclude_filter event Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2017-01-26 19:40 +0100

#1567236 — [PATCH 2/3] perf: Do error out on a kernel filter on an exclude_filter event

FromAlexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Date2017-01-26 10:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH 2/3] perf: Do error out on a kernel filter on an exclude_filter event
Message-ID<t3OQN-5FW-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
It is currently possible to configure a kernel address filter for a
event that excludes kernel from its traces (attr.exclude_kernel==1).

While in reality this doesn't make sense, the SET_FILTER ioctl() should
return a error in such case, currently it does not. Furthermore, it
will still silently discard the filter and any potentially valid filters
that came with it.

This patch makes the SET_FILTER ioctl() error out in such cases.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index b422b5feee..36770a13ef 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -8261,6 +8261,7 @@ perf_event_parse_addr_filter(struct perf_event *event, char *fstr,
 		 * attribute.
 		 */
 		if (state == IF_STATE_END) {
+			ret = -EINVAL;
 			if (kernel && event->attr.exclude_kernel)
 				goto fail;
 
-- 
2.11.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1567646 — Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Do error out on a kernel filter on an exclude_filter event

FromMathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date2017-01-26 19:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] perf: Do error out on a kernel filter on an exclude_filter event
Message-ID<t3X7I-2kP-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1567236
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:40:56AM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> It is currently possible to configure a kernel address filter for a
> event that excludes kernel from its traces (attr.exclude_kernel==1).
> 
> While in reality this doesn't make sense, the SET_FILTER ioctl() should
> return a error in such case, currently it does not. Furthermore, it
> will still silently discard the filter and any potentially valid filters
> that came with it.
> 
> This patch makes the SET_FILTER ioctl() error out in such cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/events/core.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index b422b5feee..36770a13ef 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -8261,6 +8261,7 @@ perf_event_parse_addr_filter(struct perf_event *event, char *fstr,
>  		 * attribute.
>  		 */
>  		if (state == IF_STATE_END) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			if (kernel && event->attr.exclude_kernel)
>  				goto fail;

Yes, I stumbled on that when implementing filters on CS and could swear I had a
patch for it.  It obviously never got sent out.

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

>  
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web