Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1564982 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-23 15:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-24 14:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] tcb_clksrc: Use 32 bit tcb as sched_clock Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2017-01-23 15:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] tcb_clksrc: Use 32 bit tcb as sched_clock Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2017-01-24 14:40 +0100
| From | Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-23 15:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] tcb_clksrc: Use 32 bit tcb as sched_clock |
| Message-ID | <t2Nk5-78N-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 02:50:59PM +0100, David Engraf wrote: > On newer boards the TC can be read as single 32 bit value without locking. > Thus the clock can be used as reference for sched_clock which is much more > accurate than the jiffies implementation. > > Tested on a Atmel SAMA5D2 board. > > Signed-off-by: David Engraf <david.engraf@sysgo.com> > --- Nicolas, if you agree I will take this change. -- Daniel
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-24 14:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t39uh-4Sz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1564982 |
Le 23/01/2017 à 14:59, Daniel Lezcano a écrit : > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 02:50:59PM +0100, David Engraf wrote: >> On newer boards the TC can be read as single 32 bit value without locking. >> Thus the clock can be used as reference for sched_clock which is much more >> accurate than the jiffies implementation. >> >> Tested on a Atmel SAMA5D2 board. >> >> Signed-off-by: David Engraf <david.engraf@sysgo.com> >> --- > > Nicolas, > > if you agree I will take this change. Absolutely. I've just added the Ack. Thanks for the head-up. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web