Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1564980 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> - 2017-01-23 14:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST  backends Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-01-23 15:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de> - 2017-01-23 15:40 +0100

#1564980 — Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

Am 04.01.2017 um 23:06 schrieb Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>:

> On Mon,  2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc
>> for QEMU's documentation.  Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively
>> straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes.  Patches 3 to 5, instead,
>> are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with
>> the input and output of the rST backend.
>> 
>> I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends;
>> but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm
>> trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :)
> 
> I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll
> go ahead and apply them.

Hi Paolo !

Sorry for my late reply, I'am testing patch 2:

  https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-doc@vger.kernel.org/msg08503.html

but I can't find any changes in the reST output (even not in include/linux/log2.h
you mentioned). May I'm a bit blind today, so can you give me an example where
the patch takes effect?

Thanks,

  -- Markus --

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1564984 — Re: [PATCH 0/5] kernel-doc tweaks and cleanup of rST vs. non-rST backends

On 23/01/2017 14:42, Markus Heiser wrote:
> 
> Am 04.01.2017 um 23:06 schrieb Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>:
> 
>> On Mon,  2 Jan 2017 16:22:22 +0100
>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> these patches are the result of my experiments with using kernel-doc
>>> for QEMU's documentation.  Patches 1 and 2 should be relatively
>>> straightforward, as they are simple bugfixes.  Patches 3 to 5, instead,
>>> are making the docbook backend (and the others too) more consistent with
>>> the input and output of the rST backend.
>>>
>>> I am not sure what is the state of the kernel-doc non-rST backends;
>>> but there are still several books using the docbook workflow, so I'm
>>> trying my luck and sending the patches anyway. :)
>>
>> I've played with them a bit, and they don't seem to break things, so I'll
>> go ahead and apply them.
> 
> Hi Paolo !
> 
> Sorry for my late reply, I'am testing patch 2:
> 
>   https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-doc@vger.kernel.org/msg08503.html
> 
> but I can't find any changes in the reST output (even not in include/linux/log2.h
> you mentioned). May I'm a bit blind today, so can you give me an example where
> the patch takes effect?

I found this with QEMU.  You need to test with an inline function which
has attributes with arguments.

Paolo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1565003

Am 23.01.2017 um 14:58 schrieb Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>:
>> 
>> Hi Paolo !
>> 
>> Sorry for my late reply, I'am testing patch 2:
>> 
>>  https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-doc@vger.kernel.org/msg08503.html
>> 
>> but I can't find any changes in the reST output (even not in include/linux/log2.h
>> you mentioned). May I'm a bit blind today, so can you give me an example where
>> the patch takes effect?
> 
> I found this with QEMU.  You need to test with an inline function which
> has attributes with arguments.

Ah, mostly about QEMU .. OK now I see also a small effect on kernel's source:

  https://github.com/return42/sphkerneldoc/commit/cecfe275

Sorry for the noise.

-- Markus --

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web