Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1562556 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver for 98DX3236 SoC

Started byRussell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
First post2017-01-19 11:10 +0100
Last post2017-01-26 15:20 +0100
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver for 98DX3236 SoC Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-01-19 11:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver for 98DX3236 SoC Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> - 2017-01-19 22:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver for 98DX3236 SoC Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> - 2017-01-23 09:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver for 98DX3236 SoC Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-01-26 15:20 +0100

#1562556 — Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver for 98DX3236 SoC

FromRussell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Date2017-01-19 11:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCHv4 3/5] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver for 98DX3236 SoC
Message-ID<t1hPk-8P-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:12:18PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
> +static struct mvebu_mpp_ctrl mv98dx3236_mpp_controls[] = {
> +	MPP_FUNC_CTRL(0, 32, NULL, armada_xp_mpp_ctrl),
> +};

As Linus has taken my mvebu pinctrl series, this will need to be
changed to "mvebu_mmio_mpp_ctrl" rather than "armada_xp_mpp_ctrl"
when it's merged.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1563102

FromChris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date2017-01-19 22:20 +0100
Message-ID<t1shI-6HR-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1562556
On 19/01/17 23:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:12:18PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
>> +static struct mvebu_mpp_ctrl mv98dx3236_mpp_controls[] = {
>> +	MPP_FUNC_CTRL(0, 32, NULL, armada_xp_mpp_ctrl),
>> +};
>
> As Linus has taken my mvebu pinctrl series, this will need to be
> changed to "mvebu_mmio_mpp_ctrl" rather than "armada_xp_mpp_ctrl"
> when it's merged.
>

OK I was thinking about rebasing my series so maybe it's time.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1564755

FromChris Packham <Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Date2017-01-23 09:20 +0100
Message-ID<t2I14-40Y-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1563102
On 20/01/17 10:10, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 19/01/17 23:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:12:18PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
>>> +static struct mvebu_mpp_ctrl mv98dx3236_mpp_controls[] = {
>>> +	MPP_FUNC_CTRL(0, 32, NULL, armada_xp_mpp_ctrl),
>>> +};
>>
>> As Linus has taken my mvebu pinctrl series, this will need to be
>> changed to "mvebu_mmio_mpp_ctrl" rather than "armada_xp_mpp_ctrl"
>> when it's merged.
>>
>
> OK I was thinking about rebasing my series so maybe it's time.
>

I noticed the mvebu pinctrl series isn't in Linus's (Torvalds) tree. Is 
this on the cards for v4.10 or is it waiting for the next merge window? 
In other words should I send v5 or my series now or wait for this to be 
merged so I can rebase on top of it?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1567450

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2017-01-26 15:20 +0100
Message-ID<t3T46-8qV-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1564755
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Chris Packham
<Chris.Packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:

> I noticed the mvebu pinctrl series isn't in Linus's (Torvalds) tree. Is
> this on the cards for v4.10 or is it waiting for the next merge window?

Next merge window.

> In other words should I send v5 or my series now or wait for this to be
> merged so I can rebase on top of it?

Rebase it on my devel branch in the pin control tree:
git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git
cd linux-pinctrl
git checkout -b devel origin/devel
[git am .. / git pull old-branch]

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web