Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1564635 > unrolled thread

RE: [PATCH v3 4/4] PM / devfreq: Modify the device name as devfreq[X] for sysfs

Started byMyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
First post2017-01-23 03:20 +0100
Last post2017-01-23 04:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  RE: [PATCH v3 4/4] PM / devfreq: Modify the device name as devfreq[X]  for sysfs MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> - 2017-01-23 03:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] PM / devfreq: Modify the device name as devfreq[X]  for sysfs Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> - 2017-01-23 04:40 +0100

#1564635 — RE: [PATCH v3 4/4] PM / devfreq: Modify the device name as devfreq[X] for sysfs

FromMyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Date2017-01-23 03:20 +0100
SubjectRE: [PATCH v3 4/4] PM / devfreq: Modify the device name as devfreq[X] for sysfs
Message-ID<t2CoF-pF-1@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

>  	if (!dev || !profile || !governor_name) {
> @@ -568,7 +569,8 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>  		mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
>  	}
>  
> -	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "%s", dev_name(dev));
> +	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%lu",
> +			(unsigned long)atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));

Do you have any specific reason to use "unsigned long" here?
(atomic_t has 32bit int).

>  	err = device_register(&devfreq->dev);
>  	if (err) {
>  		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
> -- 
> 1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1564644

FromChanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Date2017-01-23 04:40 +0100
Message-ID<t2DE7-1bF-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1564635
On 2017년 01월 23일 11:19, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>  	if (!dev || !profile || !governor_name) {
>> @@ -568,7 +569,8 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>>  		mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "%s", dev_name(dev));
>> +	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%lu",
>> +			(unsigned long)atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));
> 
> Do you have any specific reason to use "unsigned long" here?
> (atomic_t has 32bit int).

There is no any reason. I'll change to use the integer value as following:

	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%d", atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));


> 
>>  	err = device_register(&devfreq->dev);
>>  	if (err) {
>>  		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
S/W R&D Center
Samsung Electronics

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web