Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1563807 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-20 18:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-20 18:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [patch-rt] softirq: Move ksoftirqd_running() under !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2017-01-20 18:30 +0100
| From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-20 18:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [patch-rt] softirq: Move ksoftirqd_running() under !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL |
| Message-ID | <t1LaG-1Gn-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 2016-12-31 09:20:10 [+0100], Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Otherwise, ktimersoftd may not be awakened when it has work to do. so the problem is that we have two softirq threads and we only check the state of the "normal" one even if we would have also the schedule the second one. The approach looks good, applied. > [ 84.087571] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > [ 84.087593] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > [ 84.087598] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > [ 84.087904] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > [ 84.088526] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > [ 84.088899] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > [ 84.089463] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > [ 115.013470] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > [ 115.013601] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > [ 115.013709] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 02 > > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Sebastian
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web