Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1560037 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-16 21:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-19 00:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-01-16 21:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-01-17 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-01-19 00:10 +0100
| From | "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-16 21:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V7 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort |
| Message-ID | <t0lV0-5Di-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello Will,
On 1/16/2017 4:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:15:18AM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
>> Code.
>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
>> the handlers registered in the notification list.
>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
>> new SEA handler is used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 13 ++++++++
>> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> index 57f110b..e7f3440 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> @@ -64,4 +64,17 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>>
>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>
>> +/*
>> + * The functions below are used to register and unregister callbacks
>> + * that are to be invoked when a Synchronous External Abort (SEA)
>> + * occurs. An SEA is raised by certain fault status codes that have
>> + * either data or instruction abort as the exception class, and
>> + * callbacks may be registered to parse or handle such hardware errors.
>> + *
>> + * Registered callbacks are run in an interrupt/atomic context. They
>> + * are not allowed to block or sleep.
>> + */
>> +int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>> +void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> I still don't understand why you need notifiers for this. You register
> precisely one hook in the series.
I didn't see a response to my last comment on the previous series so I
just left it in for this series.
The notifier usage is consistent with the GHES code for SCI errors which
are also only used a single
time in the code. If you think making the call directly is a better
option I will remove the notifiers.
>> #endif /* __ASM_SYSTEM_MISC_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> index 05d2bd7..81039c7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,22 @@
>> #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>> #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>>
>> +/*
>> + * GHES SEA handler code may register a notifier call here to
>> + * handle HW error record passed from platform.
>> + */
>> +static ATOMIC_NOTIFIER_HEAD(sea_handler_chain);
>> +
>> +int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>> +{
>> + return atomic_notifier_chain_register(&sea_handler_chain, nb);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>> +{
>> + atomic_notifier_chain_unregister(&sea_handler_chain, nb);
>> +}
>> +
>> static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr);
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
>> @@ -480,6 +496,28 @@ static int do_bad(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * This abort handler deals with Synchronous External Abort.
>> + * It calls notifiers, and then returns "fault".
>> + */
>> +static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + struct siginfo info;
>> +
>> + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&sea_handler_chain, 0, NULL);
>> +
>> + pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
>> + fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
>> +
>> + info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
>> + info.si_errno = 0;
>> + info.si_code = 0;
>> + info.si_addr = (void __user *)addr;
>> + arm64_notify_die("", regs, &info, esr);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct fault_info {
>> int (*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>> int sig;
>> @@ -502,22 +540,22 @@ static const struct fault_info {
>> { do_page_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "level 1 permission fault" },
>> { do_page_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "level 2 permission fault" },
>> { do_page_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "level 3 permission fault" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous external abort" },
>> + { do_sea, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous external abort" },
>> { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 17" },
>> { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 18" },
>> { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 19" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous parity error" },
>> + { do_sea, SIGBUS, 0, "level 0 SEA (translation table walk)" },
>> + { do_sea, SIGBUS, 0, "level 1 SEA (translation table walk)" },
>> + { do_sea, SIGBUS, 0, "level 2 SEA (translation table walk)" },
>> + { do_sea, SIGBUS, 0, "level 3 SEA (translation table walk)" },
> Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my previous review, but please expand the
> acronym for strings and comments.
Sorry, I will expand these.
>> + { do_sea, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous parity or ECC err" },
> s/err/error/
>
> Will
Thanks,
Tyler
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-17 11:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0zbz-5Tg-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1560037 |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 01:09:22PM -0700, Baicar, Tyler wrote: > On 1/16/2017 4:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:15:18AM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote: > >>SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware > >>error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort > >>exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status > >>Code. > >>When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through > >>the handlers registered in the notification list. > >>Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the > >>new SEA handler is used. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> > >>Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org> > >>Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org> > >>--- > >> arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 13 ++++++++ > >> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > >> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > >> > >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h > >>index 57f110b..e7f3440 100644 > >>--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h > >>+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h > >>@@ -64,4 +64,17 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd); > >> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ > >>+/* > >>+ * The functions below are used to register and unregister callbacks > >>+ * that are to be invoked when a Synchronous External Abort (SEA) > >>+ * occurs. An SEA is raised by certain fault status codes that have > >>+ * either data or instruction abort as the exception class, and > >>+ * callbacks may be registered to parse or handle such hardware errors. > >>+ * > >>+ * Registered callbacks are run in an interrupt/atomic context. They > >>+ * are not allowed to block or sleep. > >>+ */ > >>+int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > >>+void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); > >I still don't understand why you need notifiers for this. You register > >precisely one hook in the series. > I didn't see a response to my last comment on the previous series so I just > left it in for this series. > The notifier usage is consistent with the GHES code for SCI errors which are > also only used a single > time in the code. If you think making the call directly is a better option I > will remove the notifiers. Yes, please. It's easy to add the notifier infrastructure back if/when it's actually needed and I don't see why the low-level fault dispatching needs to be consistent with the GHES/SCI code. Will
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-19 00:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t17wD-1Zz-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1560435 |
On 1/17/2017 3:27 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 01:09:22PM -0700, Baicar, Tyler wrote: >> On 1/16/2017 4:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:15:18AM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote: >>>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware >>>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort >>>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status >>>> Code. >>>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through >>>> the handlers registered in the notification list. >>>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the >>>> new SEA handler is used. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org> >>>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org> >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 13 ++++++++ >>>> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >>>> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h >>>> index 57f110b..e7f3440 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h >>>> @@ -64,4 +64,17 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd); >>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ >>>> +/* >>>> + * The functions below are used to register and unregister callbacks >>>> + * that are to be invoked when a Synchronous External Abort (SEA) >>>> + * occurs. An SEA is raised by certain fault status codes that have >>>> + * either data or instruction abort as the exception class, and >>>> + * callbacks may be registered to parse or handle such hardware errors. >>>> + * >>>> + * Registered callbacks are run in an interrupt/atomic context. They >>>> + * are not allowed to block or sleep. >>>> + */ >>>> +int register_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); >>>> +void unregister_sea_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb); >>> I still don't understand why you need notifiers for this. You register >>> precisely one hook in the series. >> I didn't see a response to my last comment on the previous series so I just >> left it in for this series. >> The notifier usage is consistent with the GHES code for SCI errors which are >> also only used a single >> time in the code. If you think making the call directly is a better option I >> will remove the notifiers. > Yes, please. It's easy to add the notifier infrastructure back if/when it's > actually needed and I don't see why the low-level fault dispatching needs to > be consistent with the GHES/SCI code. > > Will Sounds good, I will remove the notifier in the next patchset. Thanks, Tyler -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web