Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1558888 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-14 10:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-17 02:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu: Add long-term CPU kicking "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-14 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu: Add long-term CPU kicking Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> - 2017-01-16 09:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu: Add long-term CPU kicking "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-01-17 02:10 +0100
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-14 10:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/20] rcu: Add long-term CPU kicking |
| Message-ID | <sZsFc-49R-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Commit d2db185bfee8 ("rcu: Remove short-term CPU kicking") removed
frequent calls to resched_cpu(), which means that the only time
resched_cpu() is invoked is after an RCU CPU stall warning. Although
this is good from an avoid-IPIs perspective, we should try to break
things loose -before- splatting. This commit therefore starts invoking
resched_cpu() for each holdout at each force-quiescent-state interval
that is more than halfway through the stall-warning interval.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 3c0d6c129718..5a4aaad75e76 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1220,6 +1220,13 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp,
rdp->rsp->jiffies_resched += 5; /* Re-enable beating. */
}
+ /*
+ * If more than halfway to RCU CPU stall-warning time, do
+ * a resched_cpu() to try to loosen things up a bit.
+ */
+ if (jiffies - rdp->rsp->gp_start > rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check() / 2)
+ resched_cpu(rdp->cpu);
+
return 0;
}
--
2.5.2
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-16 09:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0amS-5yy-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1558888 |
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:13:09AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Commit d2db185bfee8 ("rcu: Remove short-term CPU kicking") removed
> frequent calls to resched_cpu(), which means that the only time
> resched_cpu() is invoked is after an RCU CPU stall warning. Although
> this is good from an avoid-IPIs perspective, we should try to break
> things loose -before- splatting. This commit therefore starts invoking
> resched_cpu() for each holdout at each force-quiescent-state interval
> that is more than halfway through the stall-warning interval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Could you please reverse the order of patches 7 and 8, so that
unnecessary splats don't occur between the two?
For the patch itself:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
> kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 3c0d6c129718..5a4aaad75e76 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -1220,6 +1220,13 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp,
> rdp->rsp->jiffies_resched += 5; /* Re-enable beating. */
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If more than halfway to RCU CPU stall-warning time, do
> + * a resched_cpu() to try to loosen things up a bit.
> + */
> + if (jiffies - rdp->rsp->gp_start > rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check() / 2)
> + resched_cpu(rdp->cpu);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.5.2
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-17 02:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0qrF-f1-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1559502 |
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:58:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:13:09AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Commit d2db185bfee8 ("rcu: Remove short-term CPU kicking") removed
> > frequent calls to resched_cpu(), which means that the only time
> > resched_cpu() is invoked is after an RCU CPU stall warning. Although
> > this is good from an avoid-IPIs perspective, we should try to break
> > things loose -before- splatting. This commit therefore starts invoking
> > resched_cpu() for each holdout at each force-quiescent-state interval
> > that is more than halfway through the stall-warning interval.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Could you please reverse the order of patches 7 and 8, so that
> unnecessary splats don't occur between the two?
Done!
Thanx, Paul
> For the patch itself:
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
>
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 3c0d6c129718..5a4aaad75e76 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -1220,6 +1220,13 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp,
> > rdp->rsp->jiffies_resched += 5; /* Re-enable beating. */
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * If more than halfway to RCU CPU stall-warning time, do
> > + * a resched_cpu() to try to loosen things up a bit.
> > + */
> > + if (jiffies - rdp->rsp->gp_start > rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check() / 2)
> > + resched_cpu(rdp->cpu);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.5.2
> >
>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web