Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1561399 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-18 10:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-18 15:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Align stream buffer and CPB buffer to 512 Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@samsung.com> - 2017-01-18 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Align stream buffer and CPB buffer to 512 Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> - 2017-01-18 15:40 +0100
| From | Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-18 10:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] [media] s5p-mfc: Align stream buffer and CPB buffer to 512 |
| Message-ID | <t0V2p-2ja-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From MFCv6 onwards encoder stream buffer and decoder CPB buffer
need to be aligned with 512.
Signed-off-by: Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@samsung.com>
---
drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c | 9 +++++++++
drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c
index d6f207e..57da798 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c
@@ -408,8 +408,15 @@ static int s5p_mfc_set_dec_stream_buffer_v6(struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx,
struct s5p_mfc_dev *dev = ctx->dev;
const struct s5p_mfc_regs *mfc_regs = dev->mfc_regs;
struct s5p_mfc_buf_size *buf_size = dev->variant->buf_size;
+ size_t cpb_buf_size;
mfc_debug_enter();
+ cpb_buf_size = ALIGN(buf_size->cpb, CPB_ALIGN);
+ if (strm_size >= set_strm_size_max(cpb_buf_size)) {
+ mfc_debug(2, "Decrease strm_size : %u -> %zu, gap : %d\n",
+ strm_size, set_strm_size_max(cpb_buf_size), CPB_ALIGN);
+ strm_size = set_strm_size_max(cpb_buf_size);
+ }
mfc_debug(2, "inst_no: %d, buf_addr: 0x%08x,\n"
"buf_size: 0x%08x (%d)\n",
ctx->inst_no, buf_addr, strm_size, strm_size);
@@ -519,6 +526,8 @@ static int s5p_mfc_set_enc_stream_buffer_v6(struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx,
struct s5p_mfc_dev *dev = ctx->dev;
const struct s5p_mfc_regs *mfc_regs = dev->mfc_regs;
+ size = ALIGN(size, 512);
+
writel(addr, mfc_regs->e_stream_buffer_addr); /* 16B align */
writel(size, mfc_regs->e_stream_buffer_size);
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h
index 8055848..16a7b1d 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
#define FRAME_DELTA_H264_H263 1
#define TIGHT_CBR_MAX 10
+#define CPB_ALIGN 512
+#define set_strm_size_max(cpb_max) ((cpb_max) - CPB_ALIGN)
+
struct s5p_mfc_hw_ops *s5p_mfc_init_hw_ops_v6(void);
const struct s5p_mfc_regs *s5p_mfc_init_regs_v6_plus(struct s5p_mfc_dev *dev);
#endif /* S5P_MFC_OPR_V6_H_ */
--
1.7.2.3
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-18 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <t0Zz4-5fK-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1561399 |
Hi Smitha,
On 18.01.2017 10:37, Smitha T Murthy wrote:
> >From MFCv6 onwards encoder stream buffer and decoder CPB buffer
Unexpected char at the beginning.
> need to be aligned with 512.
Patch below adds checks only if buffer size is multiple of 512, am I right?
If yes, please precise the subject, for example "...CPB buffer size need
to be...".
>
> Signed-off-by: Smitha T Murthy <smitha.t@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c | 9 +++++++++
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c
> index d6f207e..57da798 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.c
> @@ -408,8 +408,15 @@ static int s5p_mfc_set_dec_stream_buffer_v6(struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx,
> struct s5p_mfc_dev *dev = ctx->dev;
> const struct s5p_mfc_regs *mfc_regs = dev->mfc_regs;
> struct s5p_mfc_buf_size *buf_size = dev->variant->buf_size;
> + size_t cpb_buf_size;
>
> mfc_debug_enter();
> + cpb_buf_size = ALIGN(buf_size->cpb, CPB_ALIGN);
Since buf_size->cpb is constant of know size there is no need to align
it here.
> + if (strm_size >= set_strm_size_max(cpb_buf_size)) {
> + mfc_debug(2, "Decrease strm_size : %u -> %zu, gap : %d\n",
> + strm_size, set_strm_size_max(cpb_buf_size), CPB_ALIGN);
> + strm_size = set_strm_size_max(cpb_buf_size);
> + }
As I understand strm_size here is a size of buffer to be decoded, why it
cannot be equal to buf_size->cpb? Commit message says nothing about it.
> mfc_debug(2, "inst_no: %d, buf_addr: 0x%08x,\n"
> "buf_size: 0x%08x (%d)\n",
> ctx->inst_no, buf_addr, strm_size, strm_size);
> @@ -519,6 +526,8 @@ static int s5p_mfc_set_enc_stream_buffer_v6(struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx,
> struct s5p_mfc_dev *dev = ctx->dev;
> const struct s5p_mfc_regs *mfc_regs = dev->mfc_regs;
>
> + size = ALIGN(size, 512);
> +
Shouldn't be CPB_ALIGN instead of 512? And more importantly size is a
length of buffer for encoded stream,
by up-aligning you tell MFC that it can write beyond the buffer, it
could potentially overwrite random memory? Am I right?
> writel(addr, mfc_regs->e_stream_buffer_addr); /* 16B align */
> writel(size, mfc_regs->e_stream_buffer_size);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h
> index 8055848..16a7b1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_opr_v6.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
> #define FRAME_DELTA_H264_H263 1
> #define TIGHT_CBR_MAX 10
>
> +#define CPB_ALIGN 512
> +#define set_strm_size_max(cpb_max) ((cpb_max) - CPB_ALIGN)
Name of the macro is misleading.
Regards
Andrzej
> +
> struct s5p_mfc_hw_ops *s5p_mfc_init_hw_ops_v6(void);
> const struct s5p_mfc_regs *s5p_mfc_init_regs_v6_plus(struct s5p_mfc_dev *dev);
> #endif /* S5P_MFC_OPR_V6_H_ */
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web