Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1561283 > unrolled thread

RE: [lkp-robot] e5a305ac4a: WARNING:at_lib/list_debug.c:#__list_del_entry_valid

Started byMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
First post2017-01-18 06:50 +0100
Last post2017-01-19 01:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  RE: [lkp-robot] e5a305ac4a:  WARNING:at_lib/list_debug.c:#__list_del_entry_valid Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> - 2017-01-18 06:50 +0100
    Re: [lkp-robot] e5a305ac4a:  WARNING:at_lib/list_debug.c:#__list_del_entry_valid Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> - 2017-01-19 01:50 +0100

#1561283 — RE: [lkp-robot] e5a305ac4a: WARNING:at_lib/list_debug.c:#__list_del_entry_valid

FromMatthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Date2017-01-18 06:50 +0100
SubjectRE: [lkp-robot] e5a305ac4a: WARNING:at_lib/list_debug.c:#__list_del_entry_valid
Message-ID<t0Ri9-8to-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: lkp-robot-request@eclists.intel.com [mailto:lkp-robot-request@eclists.intel.com] On Behalf Of kernel test robot
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
> 
> commit: e5a305ac4a5233e039586c97f4ea643a4c7dc484 ("Reimplement IDR
> and IDA using the radix tree")
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel
> .org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fnext%2Flinux-
> next.git&data=02%7C01%7Cmawilcox%40microsoft.com%7C3b615320ff5c48f
> efde708d43f40a5f9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6
> 36202994282292096&sdata=vMGk%2FAoZeMkABynnuEIiKM07li%2FzdZlSMM
> NmwNIGQ1s%3D&reserved=0 master

1. I'm not entirely convinced that this is a reasonable commit to test.  Due to the way Andrew has merged a fix for this commit in a second commit, it's expected to be buggy.  Although I don't think it could cause this specific failure pattern.  Testing commit ffc87d11841ec68a44c57735ff4fada521ab5a27 would make more sense.

2. Ignoring the mangling that outlook has done to that URL, it's pointing somewhere not very useful for a web browser to access: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/

Pointing to https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/ would make more sense

3. Thank you for reminding me that I need to send Andrew a complete replacement for that patch.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1562343

FromYe Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Date2017-01-19 01:50 +0100
Message-ID<t195n-2Ne-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1561283
On 01/18, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>From: lkp-robot-request@eclists.intel.com [mailto:lkp-robot-request@eclists.intel.com] On Behalf Of kernel test robot
>> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>> 
>> commit: e5a305ac4a5233e039586c97f4ea643a4c7dc484 ("Reimplement IDR
>> and IDA using the radix tree")
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel
>> .org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fnext%2Flinux-
>> next.git&data=02%7C01%7Cmawilcox%40microsoft.com%7C3b615320ff5c48f
>> efde708d43f40a5f9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6
>> 36202994282292096&sdata=vMGk%2FAoZeMkABynnuEIiKM07li%2FzdZlSMM
>> NmwNIGQ1s%3D&reserved=0 master
>
>1. I'm not entirely convinced that this is a reasonable commit to test.  Due to the way Andrew has merged a fix for this commit in a second commit, it's expected to be buggy.  Although I don't think it could cause this specific failure pattern.  Testing commit ffc87d11841ec68a44c57735ff4fada521ab5a27 would make more sense.
>
>2. Ignoring the mangling that outlook has done to that URL, it's pointing somewhere not very useful for a web browser to access: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/
>
>Pointing to https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/ would make more sense

Thanks for the suggestion, we'll improve it.

Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>3. Thank you for reminding me that I need to send Andrew a complete replacement for that patch.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web