Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1560856 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] sparc32: mm: srmmu: add __ro_after_init to sparc32_cachetlb_ops structures

Started byKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
First post2017-01-17 18:50 +0100
Last post2017-01-17 18:50 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] sparc32: mm: srmmu: add __ro_after_init to  sparc32_cachetlb_ops structures Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-01-17 18:50 +0100

#1560856 — Re: [PATCH] sparc32: mm: srmmu: add __ro_after_init to sparc32_cachetlb_ops structures

FromKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date2017-01-17 18:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sparc32: mm: srmmu: add __ro_after_init to sparc32_cachetlb_ops structures
Message-ID<t0G3n-1zz-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 4:31 AM, Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com> wrote:
> The objects viking_ops, viking_sun4d_smp_ops and smp_cachetlb_ops of
> type sparc32_cachetlb_ops are not modified anywhere after getting modified
> in the init functions. Inside init their reference is also stored in a
> pointer of type const struct sparc32_cachetlb_ops *. So these structures
> are never modified after init, therefore add __ro_after to the declaration
> of these structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

Yay more ro_after_init! :)

-Kees

> ---
> Instead of using __ro_after_init for the viking_* structures, should I
> use const by making two copies of these structures with different field values?
>
>  arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
> index c7f2a52..def82f6 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
> @@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ static void poke_viking(void)
>         srmmu_set_mmureg(mreg);
>  }
>
> -static struct sparc32_cachetlb_ops viking_ops = {
> +static struct sparc32_cachetlb_ops viking_ops __ro_after_init = {
>         .cache_all      = viking_flush_cache_all,
>         .cache_mm       = viking_flush_cache_mm,
>         .cache_page     = viking_flush_cache_page,
> @@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ static void poke_viking(void)
>   * flushes going at once will require SMP locking anyways so there's
>   * no real value in trying any harder than this.
>   */
> -static struct sparc32_cachetlb_ops viking_sun4d_smp_ops = {
> +static struct sparc32_cachetlb_ops viking_sun4d_smp_ops __ro_after_init = {
>         .cache_all      = viking_flush_cache_all,
>         .cache_mm       = viking_flush_cache_mm,
>         .cache_page     = viking_flush_cache_page,
> @@ -1759,7 +1759,7 @@ static void smp_flush_sig_insns(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long insn_addr)
>         local_ops->sig_insns(mm, insn_addr);
>  }
>
> -static struct sparc32_cachetlb_ops smp_cachetlb_ops = {
> +static struct sparc32_cachetlb_ops smp_cachetlb_ops __ro_after_init = {
>         .cache_all      = smp_flush_cache_all,
>         .cache_mm       = smp_flush_cache_mm,
>         .cache_page     = smp_flush_cache_page,
> --
> 1.9.1
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web