Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1557449 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration

Started byAlex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
First post2017-01-12 14:30 +0100
Last post2017-01-16 02:20 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-01-12 14:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency  consideration Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2017-01-12 21:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency  consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-01-16 02:20 +0100

#1557449 — [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration

FromAlex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Date2017-01-12 14:30 +0100
Subject[PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration
Message-ID<sYNC2-4tG-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
Kernel or user may have special requirement on cpu response time, like
if a interrupt is pinned to a cpu, we don't want the cpu goes too deep
sleep. This patch can prevent this thing happen by consider per cpu
resume_latency setting in cpu sleep state selection in menu governor.

The pm_qos_resume_latency ask device to give reponse in this time. That's
similar with cpu cstates' entry_latency + exit_latency. But since
most of cpu cstate either has no entry_latency or add it into exit_latency
So, we just can restrict this time requirement as states exit_latency.

We can set a wanted latency value according to the value of
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpuidle/stateX/latency. to just a bit
less than related state's latency value. Then cpu can get to this state
or higher.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
index 07e36bb..8d6d25c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/tick.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/math64.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
 
 /*
  * Please note when changing the tuning values:
@@ -280,17 +281,23 @@ static unsigned int get_typical_interval(struct menu_device *data)
 static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
 {
 	struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices);
+	struct device *device = get_cpu_device(dev->cpu);
 	int latency_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
 	int i;
 	unsigned int interactivity_req;
 	unsigned int expected_interval;
 	unsigned long nr_iowaiters, cpu_load;
+	int resume_latency = dev_pm_qos_read_value(device);
 
 	if (data->needs_update) {
 		menu_update(drv, dev);
 		data->needs_update = 0;
 	}
 
+	/* resume_latency is 0 means no restriction */
+	if (resume_latency && resume_latency < latency_req)
+		latency_req = resume_latency;
+
 	/* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */
 	if (unlikely(latency_req == 0))
 		return 0;
-- 
2.8.1.101.g72d917a

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1557763 — Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration

FromRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Date2017-01-12 21:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration
Message-ID<sYTR8-8jl-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1557449

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 21:27 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> Kernel or user may have special requirement on cpu response time,
> like
> if a interrupt is pinned to a cpu, we don't want the cpu goes too
> deep
> sleep. This patch can prevent this thing happen by consider per cpu
> resume_latency setting in cpu sleep state selection in menu governor.
> 
> The pm_qos_resume_latency ask device to give reponse in this time.
> That's
> similar with cpu cstates' entry_latency + exit_latency. But since
> most of cpu cstate either has no entry_latency or add it into
> exit_latency
> So, we just can restrict this time requirement as states
> exit_latency.
> 
> We can set a wanted latency value according to the value of
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpuidle/stateX/latency. to just a bit
> less than related state's latency value. Then cpu can get to this
> state
> or higher.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

-- 
All rights reversed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1559388 — Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration

FromAlex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
Date2017-01-16 02:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration
Message-ID<t047M-1vN-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1557763
Thanks a lot, Rik!

Anyone like to give more comments or pick it up?

Regards
Alex

On 01/13/2017 04:03 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web