Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1557449 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-12 14:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2017-01-16 02:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-01-12 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2017-01-12 21:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-01-16 02:20 +0100
| From | Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-12 14:30 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration |
| Message-ID | <sYNC2-4tG-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Kernel or user may have special requirement on cpu response time, like
if a interrupt is pinned to a cpu, we don't want the cpu goes too deep
sleep. This patch can prevent this thing happen by consider per cpu
resume_latency setting in cpu sleep state selection in menu governor.
The pm_qos_resume_latency ask device to give reponse in this time. That's
similar with cpu cstates' entry_latency + exit_latency. But since
most of cpu cstate either has no entry_latency or add it into exit_latency
So, we just can restrict this time requirement as states exit_latency.
We can set a wanted latency value according to the value of
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpuidle/stateX/latency. to just a bit
less than related state's latency value. Then cpu can get to this state
or higher.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
index 07e36bb..8d6d25c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/math64.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
/*
* Please note when changing the tuning values:
@@ -280,17 +281,23 @@ static unsigned int get_typical_interval(struct menu_device *data)
static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
{
struct menu_device *data = this_cpu_ptr(&menu_devices);
+ struct device *device = get_cpu_device(dev->cpu);
int latency_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
int i;
unsigned int interactivity_req;
unsigned int expected_interval;
unsigned long nr_iowaiters, cpu_load;
+ int resume_latency = dev_pm_qos_read_value(device);
if (data->needs_update) {
menu_update(drv, dev);
data->needs_update = 0;
}
+ /* resume_latency is 0 means no restriction */
+ if (resume_latency && resume_latency < latency_req)
+ latency_req = resume_latency;
+
/* Special case when user has set very strict latency requirement */
if (unlikely(latency_req == 0))
return 0;
--
2.8.1.101.g72d917a
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-12 21:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration |
| Message-ID | <sYTR8-8jl-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1557449 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, 2017-01-12 at 21:27 +0800, Alex Shi wrote: > Kernel or user may have special requirement on cpu response time, > like > if a interrupt is pinned to a cpu, we don't want the cpu goes too > deep > sleep. This patch can prevent this thing happen by consider per cpu > resume_latency setting in cpu sleep state selection in menu governor. > > The pm_qos_resume_latency ask device to give reponse in this time. > That's > similar with cpu cstates' entry_latency + exit_latency. But since > most of cpu cstate either has no entry_latency or add it into > exit_latency > So, we just can restrict this time requirement as states > exit_latency. > > We can set a wanted latency value according to the value of > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpuidle/stateX/latency. to just a bit > less than related state's latency value. Then cpu can get to this > state > or higher. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> > Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> -- All rights reversed
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-16 02:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration |
| Message-ID | <t047M-1vN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1557763 |
Thanks a lot, Rik! Anyone like to give more comments or pick it up? Regards Alex On 01/13/2017 04:03 AM, Rik van Riel wrote: > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web