Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1515442 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: single: Use generic parser and #pinctrl-cells for pinctrl-single,pins

Started byLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
First post2016-11-04 22:50 +0100
Last post2016-11-04 22:50 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: single: Use generic parser and  #pinctrl-cells for pinctrl-single,pins Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-11-04 22:50 +0100

#1515442 — Re: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: single: Use generic parser and #pinctrl-cells for pinctrl-single,pins

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2016-11-04 22:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/4] pinctrl: single: Use generic parser and #pinctrl-cells for pinctrl-single,pins
Message-ID<szUx3-7cG-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:

> We can now use generic parser. To support the legacy binding without
> #pinctrl-cells, add pcs_quirk_missing_pinctrl_cells() and warn about
> missing #pinctrl-cells.
>
> Let's also update the documentation for struct pcs_soc_data while at it
> as that seems to be out of date.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>

Patch applied.

> Looking at some make randconfig results, looks like we don't have
> of_add_property() and of_remove_property() exported. Is there some
> reason not to export them?

If there is too much fuzz from the builders we need to think of something.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web