Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1515392 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 14/17] ASoC: add simple-graph-card document

Started byMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
First post2016-11-04 21:40 +0100
Last post2016-11-04 21:40 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 14/17] ASoC: add simple-graph-card document Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-11-04 21:40 +0100

#1515392 — Re: [PATCH 14/17] ASoC: add simple-graph-card document

FromMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date2016-11-04 21:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 14/17] ASoC: add simple-graph-card document
Message-ID<szTrk-6zi-31@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 01:19:58AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:

> +This Simple-Graph-Card should be located as CPU driver's port[s].
> +And then, CPU driver need to probe it by itself.

This document really needs quite a bit of fleshing out but I'm not sure
that should be a blocker for the series as a whole especially given that
English is not your native language - we can build out later.  I think
based on what I'm understanding here I like what I'm seeing.  It'd be
good to get some confirmation from the people with more of_graph
knowledge that this is a good usage.

One thing I'm not 100% clear on here is why it has to be a CPU DAI (I'm
guessing just one of them though the above says ports as an option?)
that creates the card?  Is there a concrete reason for that or is it
just being defined as good pracctice?

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web